My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-06-15 clsd and spc
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-06-15 clsd and spc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2009 11:02:15 AM
Creation date
6/11/2009 1:31:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/15/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'Budget' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />8A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Big City Mayors Meet with State Lawmakers <br /> <br />League President and Rolling Hills Estates Mayor Judy Mitchell joined mayors representing five <br />of the state's largest cities, on Tuesday, May 26 in a series of meetings to oppose the borrowing <br />of local government funds. In the meetings were Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, San <br />Diego Mayor Jim Sanders, Santa Ana Mayor Miguel Pulido, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson <br />and a member of Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums' staff. <br /> <br />The mayors met with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Director of Finance Mike Genest, State <br />Controller John Chiang, State Treasurer Bill Lockyer, Senate Republican Leader Dennis <br />Hollingsworth (R-Murrieta) and Assembly Republican Leader Sam Blakeslee (R-San Luis <br />Obispo ). <br /> <br />The dominant theme of the meetings, as well as a mid-day press conference, was the opposition <br />to borrowing local government revenues. The mayors shared with constitutional officers negative <br />impacts to cities that this proposal would create. The mayors are planning to return to the Capitol <br />next Wednesday to continue to lobby on behalf of cities. <br /> <br />SaveYourCity.net Launches <br /> <br />Also on Tuesday, the League launched www.SaveYourCitv.net as a forum for mayors, city <br />council members and concerned members of the public to tell their stories about how their city <br />will be impacted if the state borrows $2 billion in local property tax revenues. <br /> <br />The site features video testimonials that are automatically sent to the Governor and the <br />legislators of the person who submitted the video. In just a few days, hundreds of city officials, <br />business and community leaders and the public have already submitted video testimony to <br />lawmakers and the Governor through www.SaveYourCitv.net. <br /> <br />City officials are encouraged to upload a video testimonial to the Web site. The League's regional <br />public affairs directors can tape your message and help you upload it. Contact your regional <br />publiC affairs director to take action! <br /> <br />Additional Budget Proposals that Impact Local Governments <br /> <br />The Governor's office released an additional list of proposed cuts on Tuesday, May 26 which are <br />intended to replace the $5.6 billion revenue anticipation warrants in the original May Revise <br />proposal. Most important to cities is the proposal to take $750 million from the local share of <br />Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) (gas tax) to pay for bond debt. bringing the total local share <br />next year from $1.05 billion to $300 million. This would not be a loan, so cities would not be <br />repaid in the future. <br /> <br />Last week on Thursday, May 21, the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) released analysis of the <br />Governor's May revise which also included additional budget suggestions. The LAO has <br />proposed borrowing $1.03 billion in HUTA revenues in FY 2009-10 with repayment to happen in <br />the next two-to-three years. League attorneys are also analyzing potential legalities associated <br />with this proposal. Finally, LAO has proposed redirecting some local public safety program <br />funding to the General Fund. These are just suggestions from the LAO, and so far neither the <br />Governor nor the Legislature has included them in their own proposals. <br /> <br />The Governor's Administration indicated on Tuesday in the Budget Conference Committee that <br />additional proposals for cuts could be e~pected. The Legislature has asked that the cuts be <br />released with details by the end of Friday. <br /> <br />During a Budget Conference Committee hearing on Thursday, the League strongly opposed this <br />proposal based upon the devastating impact that losing these funds would cause to local <br />communities. In addition, the League testified how this proposal breaks faith with the intent of the <br />voters when they voted for various state infrastructure bonds because it is likely that the voters <br />would not have supported taking local revenues to pay for the bonds. The League's initial legal <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.