Laserfiche WebLink
well as height. Council asked about the retaining wall and drainage. Mr. Vorametsanti, <br /> Supervising Engineer, explained that no project will be approved without being legally <br /> compliant and he assured Council of such. <br /> Council asked questions about staff's interpretation. Council inquired about current and <br /> past practices and Ms. Ekas provided details. She explained the goal is to work with the <br /> environment of the site adding some variety, consider common areas, pleasing <br /> landscaping and open space. One Council Member commented that the pitched roof was <br /> attractive. The Council discussed the greenery around the property. <br /> Council asked about the changes that the developer made taking in account the <br /> comments from the community. Ms. Ekas said that the following items were revised: five <br /> balconies were eliminated, ongoing dialogue on tree selection, one unit was moved <br /> towards the street, six parking spaces were interspersed, and an increase in the front <br /> setback of the two front units. Council asked for a demo of the solar impacts. Ms. Ekas <br /> covered the shadow studies in detail (presentation on file). <br /> Council asked what would happen if the developer was to reduce the height. Staff said <br /> this would probably impact density. Parking by permit was also discussed and how this <br /> might be implemented. One Council Member would like staff to look at a formula or a <br /> process determining how and when the neighborhood should be brought in so that <br /> planned development permits have a smoother outreach process. One Council Member <br /> commented on the caliber of the City's Planning staff and thanked the Planning <br /> Commission for its hard work. Mayor Foust thanked Ms. Ekas for her professional <br /> integrity shown through the public apology. One Council Member thanked Mr. Bautista for <br /> all his research and dedication to his neighborhood. <br /> Council discussed the new General Plan and how there needs to be clarity and <br /> transparency on the rules and regulations. Mayor Foust said that the Council is struggling <br /> tonight with balancing the needs and the demands of the community. She stated that <br /> housing is needed in this community. She opined that ultimately negotiations do not occur <br /> without compromise. In her opinion it is important to find the common ground and avoid <br /> absolutes. <br /> M/S Bain/Aguirre to extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously by <br /> voice vote. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Aranda referred to the zoning ordinance article 48 and 48.5 <br /> quoting the Council's options. He confirmed that Council can retain jurisdiction of the <br /> matter, and request additional information and wait for another recommendation. One <br /> Council Member commented that the developer could provide some concessions on <br /> issues related to height, parking and density. It was suggested that this matter go back to <br /> the Planning Commission and come back to the Council via an expedited process. <br /> Council discussed the various options in detail. Council Member Ira said he would prefer <br /> having the developer work with the Planning Commission and get a recommendation from <br /> them but have the Council maintain jurisdiction. He believes that density could be <br /> REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 1, 2009 <br /> MINUTES PAGE 7 <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 62 <br /> Page No. 380 <br />