|
<br />Table 3
<br />Future Water Reliability (af/yr)
<br />
<br />Descri tion
<br />ATER DEMAND
<br />Existing Customers Base Projection
<br />New Customers
<br />Passive Conservation
<br />ctive Conservation
<br />otal Water Use (Billed)
<br />Unaccounted for Water 4%
<br />otal Water Demand
<br />A TER SUPPLY
<br />Redwood City Recycled Water 30
<br />ransfers I Exchanges in or out 0
<br />esalination 0
<br />Redwood Cit' Groundwater 0
<br />
<br />ater Needed from SFPUC 12,428
<br />
<br />cenario with No SFPUC Cutback (Normal Year)
<br />FPUC Water Supplies 12,428
<br />hortage 0
<br />% Shorta e 0%
<br />cenario with 10% SFPUC Cutback (Single Dry Year)
<br />FPUC Water Supplies (1) 11,201 10,899
<br />Shortage 1,226 372
<br />% Shorta e 10.9% 3.4%
<br />cenario with 20% SFPUC Cutback (Multiple Dry Years)
<br />FPUC Water Supplies (1) 9,734 9A65 9,465 9A65 9,465
<br />hortage 2,694 1,843 1,855 2,025 2,109
<br />~ Shorta e 27.7% 19.5% 19.7% 21.5% 22.4%
<br />(1) The 2005 water supplies available to Redwood City are based on information contained in letter sent to Peter Ingram
<br />(City) from Paula Kehoe (SFPUC) dated June 1, 2005. The 2010 supplies are lower because the Redwood City-
<br />purchased water from SFPUC is expected to drop between 2005 and 2010. Other agencies will also be using more
<br />water, making less available for Redwood City. After 2010, the water supplies shown stay at 2010 levels. They could
<br />materially change with changes in the Master Contract and IWSAP scheduled to expire July 2009.
<br />Source: Redwood Ci 2005 UWMP.
<br />
<br />2005
<br />
<br />
<br />12,596
<br />-54
<br />-269
<br />.294
<br />11,979
<br />479
<br />12,458
<br />
<br />2010
<br />
<br />12,596
<br />283
<br />-523
<br />-632
<br />11 ,724
<br />469
<br />12,193
<br />
<br />922
<br />o
<br />o
<br />o
<br />11,271
<br />
<br />11,271
<br />o
<br />0%
<br />
<br />2015
<br />
<br />12,596
<br />586
<br />-712
<br />-488
<br />11,982
<br />479
<br />12,461
<br />
<br />1,178
<br />o
<br />o
<br />o
<br />11 ,283
<br />
<br />11,283
<br />o
<br />0%
<br />
<br />10,899
<br />384
<br />3.5%
<br />
<br />2020
<br />
<br />12,596
<br />1,027
<br />-853
<br />-413
<br />12,357
<br />494
<br />12,851
<br />
<br />1,398
<br />o
<br />o
<br />o
<br />11 ,453
<br />
<br />11 ,453
<br />o
<br />0%
<br />
<br />10,899
<br />554
<br />5.1%
<br />
<br />2025
<br />
<br />12,596
<br />1 ,458
<br />-959
<br />-373
<br />12,723
<br />509
<br />13 232
<br />
<br />1,695
<br />o
<br />o
<br />o
<br />11,537
<br />
<br />11,537
<br />o
<br />0%
<br />
<br />10,899
<br />638
<br />5.9%
<br />
<br />6.1E
<br />Page 13
<br />
<br />2030
<br />
<br />12,59
<br />1,97
<br />-1,03
<br />-341 .
<br />13,191
<br />52
<br />13,71
<br />
<br />
<br />11 ,72
<br />
<br />11,72
<br />
<br />10,89
<br />82
<br />7.6CX
<br />
<br />Is the Redwood City water supply sufficient for the Project?
<br />Being that Stanford has agreed to build the Project with dual-plumbing and has committed
<br />to use recycled water for both irrigation and for allowable indoor uses, Redwood City will
<br />have sufficient water supplies to meet the expected future water demands of the Stanford in
<br />Redwood City Project. During shortages, projects that increase the level of City-wide
<br />demand above the 11,724 af/yr in 2030 will cause less water to be available to existing and
<br />future water customers. Looking at 2030, the net impact of adding the projected demands of
<br />the Stanford in Redwood City Project will increase cutbacks as previously shown in Table 1.
<br />However, as explained above, the UWMP does account for some new growth in its
<br />commercial sector, for which this Project pertains. Hence, to the extent that the net increase
<br />in demand from this Project is part of the net change already projected in the UWMP, it
<br />does not lead to increased cutbacks over those shown in Table 3.
<br />
<br />Page 10 of 11
<br />
|