Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SRWC Proposed Potable and Recycled Water Options <br />(As Directed by Redwood City) <br /> <br />6.1E <br />Page 19 <br /> <br />Table 3A: Potable Water For All Water Usage <br /> <br />Potable Water Usage Recycled Water Usage <br />Projected Water Demand (From Table 2A & 28) (gpd) (gpd) <br />Indoor Demand (includes clinics, office, etc.) .. 189.500. . 0 <br />-iii-i'" 'ation' Demand"- .--..--.....-.-.....--.-......-..-..."..."..-..,,---....-.-.--......--......------..--.--.--- 46~622 ----.-.....-.."-''.-0-...-......-..---...- <br />Total (gpd) 236,122 d 0 <br />Total (AF/yr) 264.4 AFI r 0 <br />Percent ofTotal.(%) .. .... ....... .... . 100% . 0% <br /> <br />llli~~M{t;\~f;~t~.~r~;~3~~~i~~~(."@~~~~~M\r~~llim~.J;"~i'~;~~j~~J~rn~~'~!~J:~'..M;~,,::'~~~{iftf~~J.'M:I,t~'~!?;i~ <br /> <br />Table 38: Recycled Water For Irrigation Only <br /> <br />Potable Water Usage Recycled Water Usage <br /> <br />Projected Water Demand (From Table 2A & 2B) <br />In<:!~!.p.f:l'!ll:li!.d.J!~I~~.!ls clini~...2~~!_~.~:L_._..._..._.",.._.._...._....._.___ <br />Irri ation Demand <br />Total (gpd) <br />Total (AF/yr) <br />Percent of Total (%) <br />.p~~~i~;W~t~O~~fcjji1.g~Xt~ijitpi.9~~~?TQ~I.~~!~#ijg:fr9.ij1:Ta.bfeA'p)~; <br />:: :': :';: :',;: ~:~~\~~=.::r~.}~J ~.~.~ ~;:.'~{:~'i,~~\\ej{~ ::!(~,~~ :~~,~~}:~~~~ i;t~\~~~~ .:.:::,:~.~';~:';':';.~';'~~.;.:;. '.~.<Y~\~~ ;:::':~~..:.::.:::.:; . :.:;::' .~.~:: ~~(~.~:~:\.~:~~t:l~ i ~~":"; ~:;: ~~ ~::~: ;'::.::':"" ." <br /> <br /> <br />::'.::::'.:::: <br /> <br />Table 3C: Recycled Water For Toilet Flushing and Irrigation <br /> <br />Projected Water Demand (From Table 2A & 2B) <br />Indoor Demand <br />Office Oemand1 (0.06 gpd/sqft) <br />Joi~t.f!u~J!1~ets-'____.._.__.. <br />..Qri'!.~f'!.9., mechanical system, etc. <br />Research & Development (R&D) Oemand2 (0.21 gpd/sqft) <br />..!l?!!~~.!!.'!2~~!.'.J.fk.~t~:_________________..._...____.__..__.___..__._?_~~.."'............._._....._ ..._____._..._...__._..__........._....__ <br />.l?~!.nl<!.'-!J}!....r!'.~.9.!.!..~(!!~!..~~~~_I'!1L~~~~_...__...___.......____............._......._..__...___??...."{o._...__........_........._..__..._~_~.!...?55 ____...._......._......_......_ <br />Clinic Demand2 (0.18 gpd/sqft) <br />..! O'~!f!Ln..u.~f!j'.!.fl!._~~q:...__...._..._..._.._._...__._.._._..._.........._..__........__.....__..__...___~.~~..._....._.... <br />p.r.~f)~!!!.9.., "!.~f.~an!caJ system, etc. _3__.__._.___._.._..l~!(I._.._...__..._._.._..._._..?~~565 <br />Cafeteria & Common Support Uses Demand (0.63 gpd/sqft avg.) <br />..!(:)!.~(~..Y..~!r!iJ.!...~t..~:........._................._.._._...._............._......................................_......._...._.....__...1.?!o..............................__._._.._................_........... ....!.~?QQ.-.--_....- <br />.__..._ .._ Pr.!'?!!!!!.9. c~~.E!~ing, etc:-__.____ 85%..........__._________._.__. <br />1m ation Demand <br />Total (gpd) <br />Total (AF/yr) <br />Percent ofTotal (%) 47% <br /> <br />% of Water Demand <br /> <br />Potable Water Usage Recycled Water Usage <br />(gpd) (gpd) <br /> <br />80% <br />20% <br /> <br />".-..""...._._~!..QQQ..----- <br />_...!~.!...5...Q!5-==:::=~...~:::..."::.".._------- <br /> <br />7.245 <br /> <br />.._..._._._..!..~93~___ <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />1. 60% recycled waler rate based on .Water Recycling in California", prepared by Ihe Redwood City Public WOlks Services Department. April 2003. <br />2. Waler use over 0.048 gpdIsqft (or 80% of office rate) is conservatively assumed to be 100% potable. Using R&D as an example. Ihe recycled waler usage <br />rale is assumed to be 0.048 gpdIsf (same as for office) and the potable water rate is 0.162 (021 -0.048) gpdlsqfl. <br />3. 15% recycled water rate for Cafeteria & Common Support Uses per lhe City's direction. <br /> <br />BKF Engineers - 5121/2009 <br /> <br />K:\ENG08\088028\Ca!cs\SRWC-WalerUsage_OS-21.Q9 _RWC _method.xls <br />