Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />'Budget' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />HERE'S WHAT'S AT STAKE... <br /> <br />HUTA Grab <br />The proposed $1.7 billion H UTA gas tax grab Is part of the potential budget deal. This proposal <br />includes a seizure of $986.3 million of city and county HUT A funding in FY 2009-10, and an <br />additional $750 million for FY 2010-11 to pay for transportation debt services. <br /> <br />Multiple Redevelopment Proposals <br />The Big Five are currently discussing three illegal proposals related to redevelopment funds. The <br />. combined hit is $1.7 billion. <br />. A two-year $350 million annual redevelopment agency (RDA) funding seizure. <br />. A one-year $1 billion ERAF transfer for FY 2009-10. Under this proposal, agencies could <br />borrow from existing balances in their low- and moderate-income housing funds. <br />Agencies that do not or could not make their Educations Revenue Augmentation Fund <br />(ERAF) payments would have to suspend all activities and begin setting aside 30 percent <br />of tax increment for housing. Agencies making the payments would receive a one-year <br />extension on their redevelopment plan limits for receiving tax increment. <br />. An alternative proposal sponsored by the city of Industry, that faces both political and <br />legal challenges, would allow RDA project tlmellnes to be extended for 30-40 years. In <br />exchange, RDA's would be required to give the state 10 percent of revenues which the <br />state would securitize. There are a variety of hybrid versions of this proposal also being <br />discussed. (If this proposal is accepted, the concept is to limit other budget hits to local <br />government. ) <br /> <br />Proposition 1A Loan <br />Cities are still threatened by a Proposition 1 A loan despite earlier statements by Legislators <br />coming out of the June Budget Conference Committee that they "savedn local governments from <br />taking property taxes. A property tax loan puts cities in a precarious position. If the state borrows <br />property taxes, it will be extremely challenging for cities to secure financing to securitize the loan <br />against the state's repayment promise. State Treasurer Bill Lockyer has warned that Wall Street <br />is poised to downgrade the state's bond rating again. This would mean that it will be even more <br />expensive for cities forced to securitize a Prop. 1A loan. Moreover, legislative borrowing only <br />compounds the state's budgetary problems by "kicking the can down the road." <br /> <br />Next Steps <br /> <br />With all indications suggesting that a deal may be near and the legislature poised to balance its <br />budget on the backs of local government, It is Imperative that city officials contact their legislators <br />and the Governor TODAY and share how borrowing and/or taking local revenues will impact their <br />communities. PLEASE ACT NOW! <br /> <br />2 <br />