My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-07-27 spc and jnt
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-07-27 spc and jnt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2009 3:57:31 PM
Creation date
7/23/2009 2:29:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/27/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />'Budget' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />HERE'S WHAT'S AT STAKE... <br /> <br />HUTA Grab <br />The proposed $1.7 billion H UTA gas tax grab Is part of the potential budget deal. This proposal <br />includes a seizure of $986.3 million of city and county HUT A funding in FY 2009-10, and an <br />additional $750 million for FY 2010-11 to pay for transportation debt services. <br /> <br />Multiple Redevelopment Proposals <br />The Big Five are currently discussing three illegal proposals related to redevelopment funds. The <br />. combined hit is $1.7 billion. <br />. A two-year $350 million annual redevelopment agency (RDA) funding seizure. <br />. A one-year $1 billion ERAF transfer for FY 2009-10. Under this proposal, agencies could <br />borrow from existing balances in their low- and moderate-income housing funds. <br />Agencies that do not or could not make their Educations Revenue Augmentation Fund <br />(ERAF) payments would have to suspend all activities and begin setting aside 30 percent <br />of tax increment for housing. Agencies making the payments would receive a one-year <br />extension on their redevelopment plan limits for receiving tax increment. <br />. An alternative proposal sponsored by the city of Industry, that faces both political and <br />legal challenges, would allow RDA project tlmellnes to be extended for 30-40 years. In <br />exchange, RDA's would be required to give the state 10 percent of revenues which the <br />state would securitize. There are a variety of hybrid versions of this proposal also being <br />discussed. (If this proposal is accepted, the concept is to limit other budget hits to local <br />government. ) <br /> <br />Proposition 1A Loan <br />Cities are still threatened by a Proposition 1 A loan despite earlier statements by Legislators <br />coming out of the June Budget Conference Committee that they "savedn local governments from <br />taking property taxes. A property tax loan puts cities in a precarious position. If the state borrows <br />property taxes, it will be extremely challenging for cities to secure financing to securitize the loan <br />against the state's repayment promise. State Treasurer Bill Lockyer has warned that Wall Street <br />is poised to downgrade the state's bond rating again. This would mean that it will be even more <br />expensive for cities forced to securitize a Prop. 1A loan. Moreover, legislative borrowing only <br />compounds the state's budgetary problems by "kicking the can down the road." <br /> <br />Next Steps <br /> <br />With all indications suggesting that a deal may be near and the legislature poised to balance its <br />budget on the backs of local government, It is Imperative that city officials contact their legislators <br />and the Governor TODAY and share how borrowing and/or taking local revenues will impact their <br />communities. PLEASE ACT NOW! <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.