My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 12:14:46 PM
Creation date
8/6/2009 3:04:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/10/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8A <br /> Page 9 <br /> the VtF securitizatian bor�ds to prvvide advance repayment to participating cities and caunties of <br /> the state's loan repayment of local VLF funds <br /> Pending c(ean-up amendments the Prop. 1 A securitization bonds wou[d ideally be issued by the <br /> JPA and payments made to focal agencies over the nax#3—4 months, assuming everything <br /> warks properly.This will hopefully mean cities will receive their funds from the bond issue prior ta <br /> the n�:ma� Decem�er 10 property tax distributior�date.Any number of fact�rs coG!d rause a <br /> delay in this sched�le, howe�er. <br /> in the near future Califomia Communities and the League hope to send you information on how <br /> yaur city ean �a�ticipate and the�equired actions by the ci#y co�r�il by#he appficabbe deadline. In <br /> #heory i#should not cos##he city anythir�g ex�ept the cost af city attorney review of the applicable <br /> agreement to sell the Prop. 1A receivable to the JPA.ABx4 15 provides that the state will pay aIf <br /> interest and costs of issuance of the bond transac#ior� up to a certain cap. <br /> In order to control the state's cost, the legisla#ion iimi#s the issuance of the Prop. 1A securitization <br /> bonds to a large JPA fike California Comm�nities;with oversight�y#he Department of Finance <br /> and State Treasurer's Offce. Locaf agencies can ei#her pa�ticipate in the JPA securitization or <br /> wait unti12Q13 to recei�e repayment,with interest at a rate above the PMIA rafe to be set by the <br /> Director of Finance in a few mon#hs. <br /> Even though California Communi#ies successfully campleted a similar bond issue in 2�05, there - � <br /> are stil[some unknowr�s.The first is how potentia! investors will view the strength of the State's <br /> Prop. 1A loan repayme!�t comm�tment. Since A3x4 1�appears to appropriately give this <br /> constitutior�al repayment commitment a very high priority(behind only schoofs and general <br /> obiigation bonds},it should be an a#tractive investment and the recent#urbulence in the market <br /> concerning California debt obligations will hopefully not be ar� issue.This is particuiar(y important <br /> because, unli4ce in 2005, nv municipa�bond insurance is available today. <br /> It also appears to the League tha#a�umber of amendments#o ABx4 15.�re necessary to <br /> improve the#eas'sbifi#y,timing and affordabiiity of#he securitization bond issue. VIle are in <br /> discussions now with state oificials abo�t these issues.These matters couid be addressed when <br /> t€�e legislature returns after its recess. <br /> tn the next few weeics the board of directors of Cafifornia Communities is expected to select a <br /> finance team for the bond issue. Cities ar�d other fvcal agencies will then begin to be contacted <br /> with the detailed information on how to par�icipate if they so choose. <br /> `RedevelopmenY Continued fram Page 9... <br /> The Sacramento Superior Cour�in April 2009 ruled unconstitutional the redirec#ion of$350 million <br /> in redeveiopment funds to the state's generaf€und for�'1(200&09.The Califomia Redevelopment <br /> Ager�cy(CRA)is preparing another lawsuit agains#�he state on the constitutionality of this new <br /> � se'szure and is currently seeking p(aintiffs from its agency members to join the suit. <br /> Guidelines for plai�tiffs are forthcoming and willing agencies wilf be aslced to provide information <br /> about�ond indeb#edness, sta#us of existing contractual obiigations, �f1C�SC�lUOIS WIt�11f1 t�t�if <br /> project areas(or the fack of thern}. <br /> Redevelopmen#agencies interested in joining as a plaintiff should contact Brent Hawki�s at <br /> bhawkins{cr�.mhalaw.com or(916}448-8760. <br /> Economic Impact <br /> CRA has caiculated what the Ioss of redevelapment funds wiil mean to the economy. For FY <br /> 2009-10,CRA es#imat�s that if these funds were invested in local communities for affordabie <br /> housing, improved infrastructure, community faci{i#ies, it would support about 164,000 fu[I-and <br /> part-fiime jobs in cons#ruction and related sectors of the economy.The$350 mi[fion loss next <br /> fiscal year CRA estimafies would support nearly 34,000 jobs. <br /> The California Employment Devefopment Depar�ment p�blished a star�ling summary of job <br /> declines by sector over the last year. From Apri12Q08 to Apri!2009,the construction sector alone <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.