My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:58:43 AM
Creation date
8/20/2009 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />San Mateo County <br />City Managers Association <br /> <br />6.1G <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />b) Maintain City services and infrastructure. <br />Clearly the costs of maintaining the workforce cannot come at the expense of <br />f~ling sewer systems, water plants, library services and recreation programs. The <br />taxpayer who funds City services and programs should have those services and <br />programs available to himlher now and in generations to come. <br /> <br />c) Honor the tenets of public service. <br />Many who join municipal organizations do so for the challenging and rewarding <br />work, the ability to make a difference in their communities and the relative <br />security in their positions in a stable organization. Cities don't offer the "glitz" <br />associated with many private sector organizations, but we do offer a sense of <br />purpose and meaning in serving the community. As such, we must examine our <br />.current compensation programs that reward perfonnance and insure that these <br />programs are not so costly that we are forced to continually reduce our <br />workforces because of the exorbitant costs associated with each full-time <br />equivalent employee. <br /> <br />Ill) General responses to the recommendations <br /> <br />MERC surveyed City Managers, Human Resources Directors and Finance Directors in <br />San Mateo County regarding the Grand Jury's recently released report and has confirmed <br />support for consideration of the options that follow. Many respondents pointed out that <br />they cUlTently employ the stated recommendations: <br />a. Creating a two tier retirement and health-care benefits system for new hires. <br />b. Replacing current post-employment health care plans with health saving plans <br />funded during active employment with the agency. . <br />c.' Lobbying Cal PERS to increase the age at which employees can start <br />receiving retirement benefits from age 50 or 55 to age 60 for non safety <br />employees <br />d. Basing pensions on the average of the last three to five years of salary. <br />. e. Making provisions for increasing. employee contributions to current pensions <br />and post-retirement health care plans. In addition we believe that cities <br />should be looking to active employees to pay for some portion of their health <br />care, vision, and dental cost. . <br />f.' Review the practice of converting accumulated sick leave to cash and consider <br />placing caps on accumulation of sick leave. <br />g. Broadening the compensation discussions by considering comparable jobs in <br />both the private and public sectors. It is important to point out that some <br />professions will not have comparable positions, especially sworn safety <br />positions. A better comparison may be to look at the ratio of salary to benefit <br />costs of private employers and also the average salary increases given in mid- <br />size, private organizations in the region. <br />h. Consider the number of applicants for respective jobs when negotiating <br />salaries. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.