My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:58:43 AM
Creation date
8/20/2009 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />San M~eo County <br />City Managers Association <br /> <br />6.1G <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Although there is general support for conducting a public meeting(s) to solicit community <br />input regarding potential actions or changes that would be appropriate relative to rising <br />cost for public employees, there is concern that using that public forum to develop a <br />specific action would be problematic from a labor relations and confidentiality . <br />standpoint. As employers, we have an affirmative obligation to collectively bargain with <br />our units..However, there is agreement that the public input received at such a meeting <br />should be taken into consideration in the development of an action plan to guide the <br />city's future actions relative to labor negotiations. <br /> <br />There was no support for the recommendation to develop local ballot initiatives should <br />the elected Council members be reluctant to support two tier retirement systems relative <br />to pensions and health benefits. That recommendation appears to challenge the wisdom <br />of the republic fonn of government where voters elect representatives to invest the time <br />and energy to understand the issues and once so informed they vote to set public policy. <br />Although we generally share and appreciate the members of the" grand jury's passion for <br />their conclusion that a two tier system is in order, we cannot support the notion that if <br />duly elected representatives do not share their conclusion that an elected body should be <br />denied its ability to make such a decision. <br /> <br />On behalf of the City Managers Association and Human Resources Association of San <br />Mateo County I thank you for your attention to ili:is very complex issue. As we examine <br />the area of wages and benefits to public employees we will all need to work together and <br />think creatively to attract and retain our workforce while still providing critical services <br />to our community. The grand jury's reP':lrt elevates the discussion and brings the issue <br />center stage in San Mateo County. Clearly the situation that exists today did nQt occur <br />over night nor will efforts to make desired changes be achieved over night. Although <br />not addressed in the Grand Jury Report the legal constraints and labor laws relative to <br />good faith bargaining will clearly constrain elected and appointed officials in their efforts <br />to make suggested changes. Weare hopeful that through collaboration and cooperation <br />with elected officials and labor leaders we will implement many of the recommendations <br />in the report. . <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />C~~OaCM~ <br /> <br />Connie Jackson <br />Chair San Mateo County City Managers Association <br /> <br />Cc: MERC Members <br />City Manager's Association or San Mateo County <br />Human Resources Association of San Mateo County <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.