My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:58:43 AM
Creation date
8/20/2009 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7A <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> <br />Cost Evaluation Explanations <br /> <br />SBWMA stated: <br /> <br />"1. South Bay was ranked highest by virtue of the lowest overall cost proposal at $11.6 <br />million. 'South Bay's scoring was reduced somewhat on 'reasonableness' due to the <br />Evaluation Committee's concerns regarding their extremely low transportation costs and <br />management/administration staffing levels. <br /> <br />2. Allied was ranked second due to its low overall cost, third lowest overall at $ 15.9 <br />million, and lowest total capital cost for the MRF equipment and installation ,at $15.2 <br />million. <br /> <br />3. Hudson Baylor was ranked third due to its low overall cost, second lowest overall at <br />$15.2 million, and the highest commodity revenue guarantee at $10.1 milIion. Their <br />scoring was reduced somewhat on ~'reasonableness" due to proposing the highest capital <br />cost for MRF equipment and installation at $19.8 million. <br /> <br />4. & 5. Norcal and BEST were ranked fourth and fifth, respectively, due to their high <br />overall costs. Both had the highest costs for the transfer station operations, and Norcal <br />had the second highest MRF costs. These firms' overall costs are $6 million and $6.1 <br />million, respectively, higher than SBR. <br /> <br />6. Greenstar had the fourth lowest overall cost at $16.6 million but was scored even <br />lower due to the 'reasonableness~ evaluation of their transfer station and transport costs. <br /> <br />7. Republic was ranked lowest on cost because, by far, they had the highest overall cost <br />at $19.8 million. Their proposed costs simply weren't competitive, and in several cases, <br />for MRF costs and transport costs, their costs were considered unreasonable.,,6 <br /> <br />Table 5: Recycling Revenue Guarantee <br /> <br /> COMMODITIES REVENUE <br /> GUARANTEE SHARE <br />Allied $6,750,000 80/20 <br />BEST $8,500,000 75/25 <br />Greenstar $6,750,000 75/25 <br />HBC $10,100,000 75/25 <br />Norcal $8,000,000 75/25 <br />Republic $6,750,000 75/25 <br />SBR $7,250,000 75/25 <br /> <br />6 SBWMA Facility Operations RFP. Selection Committee Report: Evaluation and Scoring of Proposals. July 17. 2008 <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.