AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

th ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Technical Change Proposed GP Direction (Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues which require Comment Element Needed further direction are highlighted.) 14. There are a lot of things not being No None changed by the General Plan, in addition to the Cargill property. Perhaps those other areas should also be referenced in the bifurcation discussion, including Bair Island, the Shores or the Hills. 15. "We heard you, Redwood City". That No Revise the Introduction to reference Community input impact. needs to be captured in the Introduction. 16. Intro should be 2-3 pages long to be Consider Options: used as a marketing tool. options: 1.Allocate funding to create a separate marketing brochure 2.Create a brief executive summary that may be used as a marketing brochure 17. The General Plan needs to be less Yes More direction is needed on this item. status quo, and more about creative solutions. 18. On page 7 there is a chart that has No Revise table title to clarify what the table presents. Built Environment land use categories, and Urban Reserve is not listed there; it should be. 19. Page 41 refers to height limit of 6 Yes Staff believes that the 6-story limit reflects community directive. However, should stories for mixed use - waterfront the proposed height limits in the General Plan be revisited? Should it include neighborhood. Sometimes taller is conducting more public outreach, as these heights were discussed in previous better for certain reasons, and we outreach materials and sessions? shouldn't be too limiting. In practical application, there should be some limits, but in the GP there should be opportunities. Six stories is shorter than what we currently allow, correct? August 20, 2009