My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:58:43 AM
Creation date
8/20/2009 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
th <br /> ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues which require <br />Comment <br />Element Needed further direction are highlighted.) <br />28. On page BE-10 (map), I thought Yes; confirm A walking shed map could show the location of neighborhood shopping centers, in <br />there should be more Neighborhood change addition to parks and community facilities. <br />Centers. proposed No change to the Neighborhoods/Centers/Corridors map. <br />Neighborhood Center Map: Include <br />smaller shopping centers (Roosevelt, 30. <br />Canyon Road) <br /> <br />29. Walking shed maps would be a Yes Proposed walking shed map to show shopping, parks, and community facilities <br />useful tool. within neighborhoods. Are there other destinations that should be on this map? <br />The walking time from these locations will be shown for one-quarter and one-half <br />miles. <br />30. Strategies (pg 14) to develop high No None. <br />density and ensure that new changes <br />harmonize with the existing character. <br />These are important, and I didn’t see <br />them specifically in the document. <br />31. Add bigger street names to maps to No Staff/consultants will review maps to determine map legibility and other methods to <br />be more user friendly. increase user friendliness <br />32. Need to consider “home Yes Are there areas of particular concern? Is the intent to encourage home occupations <br />occupations” while making efforts to limit impacts on neighborhoods? <br />and impacts on <br /> <br />neighborhood <br />33. Neighborhood Character: Mention No None <br />Mount Carmel, but should include <br />Stambaugh/Heller and Mezesville <br />34. How encourage historic No None <br />preservation and foster community <br />appreciation (maybe public tour once a <br />year?) <br />35. Section on Waterfront No None <br />neighborhoods should reference BCDC <br />and the potential development and <br />review constraints. <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.