Laserfiche WebLink
th <br /> ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues which require <br />Comment <br />Element Needed further direction are highlighted.) <br />along Guadalupe). Federal funding is <br />available. Take areas that flood, buy <br />them, turn them into parks and let them <br />flood, thereby accomplishing a few <br />things at once. <br />58. Need to create strategy for No Include program to have a community study on the Creek setback. <br />Redwood City creeks. Have a <br />community study on the Creek setback <br />(eg. Cordilleras Creek) <br />59. The Economic Development Yes Options: <br />element is using data from 2006. 1.Retain existing data <br /> <br /> 2.Allocate additional funds to update to 2007-08 data. <br /> <br /> <br />60. How do we attract more companies No None <br />such as bio-pharmacy to the Port area? <br /> <br />Maybe some port lands in the future <br />wouldn’t be used for industrial <br />anymore, but maybe manufacturing? <br />61. We may want to talk to the No Add implementation program to reach out to the community about the benefits of <br />community about the impacts of the shopping and dining in Redwood City. <br /> <br />basic economic choices they make on <br />where they shop; by supporting local <br />businesses we support the community. <br />62. What about housing need resulting None <br />from population growth? <br />63. Lack of land as a constraint should None None <br /> <br />be expressly mentioned. <br />Housing <br />64. Inclusionary housing ordinance may None Language revised to indicate the City will consider an inclusionary housing ordinance, <br />be premature. and seek direction from City Council. <br />65. Review Chart on page H-14 for None None <br />accuracy; is the percent change actually <br />percent change or a summation of <br />change? <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />