My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-08-24 clsd and reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:58:43 AM
Creation date
8/20/2009 2:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
th <br /> ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues which require <br />Comment <br />Element Needed further direction are highlighted.) <br />91. When changing or rerouting truck No None <br />routes, we need to be respectful of our <br />neighborhoods. <br />92. Greenhouse gas section: We've No Add more information on existing measures the City will continue. <br />already done a number of things, strong <br />measures, and will continue to, <br />including setting benchmarks and <br />working actively to meet them. This <br />information should be included. <br />93. New contract with San Francisco No Receive and review agreement, including appropriate information. Ask BASWA to <br />PUC for a 25 year agreement, we should review. <br />update the Plan to reflect, and have <br />BASWA review. <br />94. There was a new plan on More data Please provide reference to groundwater study for staff/consultant review and <br />groundwater for emergency use, which needed potential incorporation. <br />involves introducing more water into <br />the aquifers. If that report was accurate, <br /> <br />Natural Resources <br />then we maybe should include some <br />info here. <br />95. Need to talk about recycled water as No None <br />“gold” and think about how we can sell <br />it to other jurisdictions in exchange for <br />drinking water or money. <br />96. Page 36-37 reference to bay lands Yes Confirm: is this reference to Policy NR-6.1? <br />and restoring open space is too stark, <br />either/or and doesn't reflect our values. Revise NR-6.1. <br />Using this language, we wouldn't have <br />had the Preserve happen. <br />97. Would like more on ground water No Include reference to Infrastructure Chapter, Built Environment Element; specific to <br />and recycled water. recycled water. <br />98. The term “urban forest” doesn’t No None <br />seem appropriate. <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.