Laserfiche WebLink
Cc: PWS -Terence Kyaw <TKyaw@redwoodcity.org> <br />Subject: Fw: Follow up to yesterday and prior emails - City using the SLC/Vogel Letter as basis for not <br />paying relocation <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when <br />opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. <br />Hi, Pam, <br />Would you pis put this in the public record? Of the upcoming (next) council <br />meeting, and ensure that this is communicated to the council members? <br />This is becoming more clear in the CRAL Action, 17CIV05387 (Dept. 2 San <br />Mateo Co. Superior Court, Judge Marie Weiner). There was a CMC <br />yesterday and Kevin (outside Burke lawyer) kinda complained (a bit kinda <br />whiny annoyance) that we were trying to stay, or argue to stay. Judge <br />Weiner then said well, you really can't say you are going to mediation in <br />good faith when you make them commit to all kinds of things in advance, <br />and then I updated her on why this is a public project at 1548 Maple, with <br />the land swap, desire for public access, etc. the intended park and boat <br />launch and amphitheater seating, etc. <br />All of this makes what the City is doing at 1548 and Docktown very clear <br />that this is a public project, and that CRAL applies. Please keep this marina <br />and put it to productive use. Instead of a drain line item on the budget, <br />this could be a very lucrative business venture. Our nonprofit is equipped <br />to run it. Anyway, there is a basis under SLC and public trust policy and <br />law for us to stay (10%) as well as for full CRAL compensation. Or a blend. <br />Docktown could've been making money since 2013 when you took it over. <br />Thanks, <br />Alison <br />— Forwarded Message --- <br />From: alisonmadden > <br />To: Jennifer.Lucchesi s c.ca. ov <lenni er. ucc esi(oislc.ca.aov>; kim.lunett@O.slc.ca.aov <br /><kim.lunettaaslc.ca.aov>; Andrew Vogel <andrew.voaelloidoi.ca.aov>; Nicholas Tsukamaki <br /><nicholas.tsukamakiadoi.caio ; Daniel Slanker> <br />Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 09:08:36 A <br />Subject: Follow up to yesterday and prior emails - City using the SLCNogel Letter as basis for not paying <br />relocation <br />Hi, Jennifer, <br />Thanks for enabling receipt of the emails and statutory section screenshots <br />and putting them in the record of yesterday's meeting, and sharing them <br />with the commissioners. We appreciate that. <br />