My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2021.03.08 Special Meeting
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
AgdaPkt 2021.03.08 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2021 12:10:41 PM
Creation date
3/4/2021 6:29:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/8/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
3/9/2021 12:04 PM
Modified:
3/9/2021 12:04 PM
Text:
mailto:karen@execquestgroup.com
ID:
2
Creator:
Created:
3/9/2021 12:04 PM
Modified:
3/9/2021 12:04 PM
Text:
mailto:council@redwoodcity.org
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: <br />SV search <br />To: <br />GRP -City Council <br />Subject: <br />Liveable California <br />Date: <br />Sunday, March 7, 20215:55:15 PM <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when <br />opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. <br />Dear City Council, Mayor, <br />After two years of discussion, the town of Redwood City has been stricken with an insidious <br />"climate change" in the form of a new council trying to overturn ADU decisions that had <br />been already resolved. <br />I ask you to adopt the ordinance passed by the prior City Council which would have <br />limited detached ADUs to 16 -feet tall / one-story along the fence line. <br />There should not be separate deeds for detached ADU's. No 60% FAR's or exemptions to <br />lot coverage requirements. No airBnB type short-term rentals. No lax building codes. <br />Existing 2nd story ADU's over 16 ft should be counted as part the property's FAR (floor <br />area ratio) and limited as the prior council concluded. There never should have been any <br />allowance for picture windows vs. clerestory bearing down on neighbors thus devaluing <br />their quality of life, property and general neighborhoods. <br />To the 5 council members who are in embedded with the developers' unrelenting and <br />unbalanced thirst to build as much as possible, as densely as possible, and suck as much <br />profit away from Redwood City as possible - are as blind as the developers who know the <br />price of everything and value of nothing. You deeply fail our community with decisions <br />based on false premises and limited understanding that we are a global market — <br />maximizing every inch to build will not create an affordable housing model given the <br />constant influx of transients — you are on a fool's journey believing it will. In the process, <br />you will convert what good we do have left into crude, shanty town neighborhoods. What <br />do you think you are truly accomplishing? <br />Stop and Think, <br />K. Saucier <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.