Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Jim Bigelow, with the Redwood City San Mateo County Chamber of Commerce, supports <br />the concept of the 50-50 balanced plan. He said that it is important for Council to go into <br />the process with independent consultants to objectively look at all the various subjects, <br />and then the community can provide comment. <br /> <br />Steve Divney, resident of San Carlos and a member of the Redwood City San Mateo <br />County Chamber of Commerce and a Redwood City business owner said he agrees with <br />Jim Bigelow's comments. ' <br /> <br />Connie Sadler said she cares about the environment, lives in a RV, and owns a home in <br />Nevada. She supports this project and hopes it moves forward. She expressed concerns <br />with the lack of affordable housing, space for walking paths, recreation needs, fears about <br />flooding, and the need for a levy. <br /> <br />Brat Garret, a resident since 1994 and a Redwood City business owner, opposes the <br />development and questions Cargill's intentions in general and in regards to the Williamson <br />Act. He asked the Council to find a way to support the 4H Club without supporting Cargill, <br />such as planting farms on vacant lots. He asked the Council to request the complete <br />unedited comments and transcripts from a recent telephone survey done by DMB on <br />residents about the proposed plan. <br /> <br />Jean Isaacs said she has been a resident since 1979, is proud of Redwood City and loves <br />this community. She finds this issue divisive. She wants Council to consider the effects <br />and repercussions on the broader region and sensitive wetland areas and expressed her <br />surprise that the city would contemplate this project. <br /> <br />Greg Gomes said he was born and raised in Redwood City and he has worked in <br />construction for 30 years with the sheet metal workers. He supports the City Council in its <br />decision to hopefully initiate the process and he also expressed his support for Council <br />either way. <br /> <br />Mark Bartholomew, a planner and a resident for 21 years, said that although he has <br />always supported the purchase of land for wetland in the past, he finds this the most <br />audacious plan he has ever seen in his career. He said that he has asked questions and <br />nobody knew the answers. He believes the proposal will endanger people and create <br />adverse impacts and controversy and that people's health, safety, and welfare should not <br />be sacrificed for in lieu housing. <br /> <br />David Amann said he is a long time resident and that he runs a business downtown. He <br />believes that Redwood City has a reputation for being open and inclusive. He said there <br />is a need for independent information gathering by impartial professionals so that there <br />can be collaborative discussion and understanding of all the economic and environmental <br />impacts. He asked Council to approve the study of the proposed DMB 50-50 plan. <br /> <br />Mark Leach, representing the IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, <br />Labor Union #617, said he is a construction worker, and his goal is to build good things, <br />and that they will never know if they are building good things unless they are studied. He <br />asked Council to move forward with the study. <br /> <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />AUGUST 10, 2009 <br />PAGE 8 <br />