My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-09-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-09-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2009 11:44:09 AM
Creation date
9/10/2009 2:14:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
9/14/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
th <br />ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues <br />Comment Background Information <br />Element Needed which require further direction are highlighted.) <br />22. Pages 68-75 related to habitat and Yes Clarification and more direction is needed on this item. Page <br />sensitive areas include soft language. referenced does not seem to relate to comment. <br />Also, we don’t want that language to be <br />too limiting, so we wouldn't have a new <br />school in Area H, for example. <br />23. Support tighter language regarding Yes Clarification and more direction is needed on this item. <br />habitat and sensitive areas <br />24. Regarding Woodside Road and El During the public outreach process for the General No None <br />Camino , there is reference to study Plan, the request to remove the grade separation <br />taking down the overpass. Is someone was repeatedly made by community members. <br />really going to spend the money to do Funding considerations and limitations are noted in <br />that? Not very practical. the text. <br />25. Supports removal of Woodside Road Existing Policy: No None <br />and El Camino Real overcrossing. Policy BE-11.10: Study the feasibility of rebuilding <br />However, should include options. the intersection of Woodside Road and El Camino <br />Real as a surface intersection that establishes a <br />stronger linkage between adjacent commercial <br />districts and residential neighborhoods. Land <br />currently devoted to entrance ramps could be <br />acquired for new commercial or mixed-use infill <br />development. <br />26. Page 99 refers to Dumbarton rail No Dates will be confirmed and revised as appropriate <br />and projected dates – that information <br />is incorrect. <br />27. Page 114 refers to grade crossings No References will be fact checked and revised as appropriate. <br />being eliminated with high speed rail. Is <br />that accurate? <br />28. On page BE-10 (map), I thought The Urban Form Chapter divides the City into Yes; confirm A walking shed map could show the location of neighborhood <br />there should be more Neighborhood Centers (generally large-scale employment centers), change shopping centers, in addition to parks and community facilities. <br />Centers. corridors, and neighborhoods. Figures BE-1 and BE-proposed No change to the Neighborhoods/Centers/Corridors map. <br />Neighborhood Center Map: Include 2 reflect that. Neighborhood shopping centers are <br />smaller shopping centers (Roosevelt, 30. generally located within the Corridors, <br />Canyon Road) Neighborhoods, and Centers. <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.