Laserfiche WebLink
th <br />ATTACHMENT 1 – COMMENT MATRIX FROM JULY 27 CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Technical Change Proposed <br />GP Direction <br />(Note: Additions to text in bold, deletions strikethrough. Issues <br />Comment Background Information <br />Element Needed which require further direction are highlighted.) <br />Redwood City. <br />35. Section on Waterfront BCDC is referenced in the introduction to the Built No None <br />neighborhoods should reference BCDC Environment Element. The issue of regional <br />and the potential development and approvals is discussed in more depth in the Housing <br />review constraints. Element, including an implementation measure to <br />work with regional agencies to try to limit delays <br />resulting from regional party reviews of projects. <br />(Program HE-21) <br />36. Some designations have two In most Mixed Use designations, the maximum No None <br />different heights for the same allowable heights vary depending on what type of <br />designation; six and four stories (page use is provided – housing or commercial. Higher <br />41). Please clarify. heights are allowed for residential, and an <br />additional bonus is provided if both uses are <br />provided. <br />37. Industrial Port should reference References are also made to recycling opportunities Confirm/revise Industrial-Port Related description revised to include: <br />recycling and energy potential there. near the port in the Economic Development technical Allowed uses include industrial operations involved in the <br />(pg 43) Chapter and Infrastructure Chapter. For example: change loading/unloading, storing, recycling, and transferring of large quantities <br />Policy BE-47.4: Support retention and expansion of proposed in of dry, liquid, and neo-bulk cargoes, green energy production, as well as <br />businesses and industries in Redwood City involved bold other maritime-oriented activities…. <br />in recycling materials, especially in areas proximate <br />to the Port of Redwood City. <br />38. Support Port growth. But the Port No Revise Policy BE-21.3 to require a Port master plan related to land use, <br />Existing policies include: <br />should have a master plan show how Policy BE-21.1: Allow for growth and intensification capacity, and buffers for incompatible uses. <br />much land it needs and necessary buffer of industrial uses in the Port Industrial Center. <br />for incompatible uses Policy BE-21.2: Ensure efficient and productive use <br />of Port lands. <br />Policy BE-21.3: Prepare a plan that accommodates <br />a passenger ferry terminal at the Port, and that: <br />? <br />Applies to all of the area immediately <br /> <br />adjacent to the ferry terminal, <br />? <br />Facilitates a variety of travel mode <br /> <br />connections to various parts of Redwood <br />August 20, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />