Laserfiche WebLink
V. - <br />Social <br />. - <br />Social distancing, PPE usage, COVID-19 prevention knowledge <br />score and COVID-19 pandemic perception score <br />Participants answered a Likert scale, from never (one) to always <br />(five), for four questions that assessed employee's practice of <br />social distancing and PPE use. Participants answered another <br />Likert scale with six statements, from completely disagree (one) <br />to completely agree (five), which captured the workers' knowl- <br />edge on PPE and self-perceptions toward COVID-19 pandemic. <br />Both employee's PPE knowledge and COVID-19 perception <br />were then tabulated to a score ranging from 3 to 15. A complete <br />list of questions is included in Online -Only Supplement 1. <br />Customer exposure categorisation <br />Employees' job position was classified into two categories: those <br />with significant face-to-face, direct exposure to customers and <br />those without significant customer exposure. Employees with <br />direct customer exposure include cashier, front end associate, <br />sales associate, fresh food associate, cart attendant, janitorial <br />crew, supervisor and manager of all levels. Those without direct <br />customer exposure include stocker, backroom, receiving and <br />maintenance. <br />Study participants <br />The COVID-19 testing was conducted as part of a city -mandated <br />group testing, independent to this research. The existing medical <br />records collected for the city testing were de -identified at the <br />primary clinical site prior to analysis. Therefore, the study of <br />de -identified data received a non -human research determination <br />by the Management Sciences for Health (SC#0012020). <br />Statistical analysis <br />We performed univariate analyses to compare the workers' char- <br />acteristics by their SARS-CoV-2 RT -PCR testing results, anxiety <br />and depression status. For binary variables, Pearson's x2 test with <br />Yates' continuity correction was performed, while for variables <br />with at least one cell count less than five, Fisher's exact test <br />was conducted instead. As to continuous variables, data were <br />examined by Q -Q plots and determined if they followed normal <br />distribution beforehand. Then we performed parametric t-test or <br />non -parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test, as appropriate. <br />Logistic regression models and models adjusting for potential <br />confounders were further built. Due to the small sample size and <br />event numbers, we used the inverse probability weighting (IPW) <br />method to avoid inflated SEs of the parameter estimates. 22 The <br />IPW was calculated based on the selected variables determined <br />from the univariate analyses results. Extreme weights (below the <br />5th and above the 95th percentile) were truncated as an addi- <br />tional sensitivity analysis. ORs with 95% CIs were presented. <br />We performed secondary sensitivity analysis according to <br />employees' job titles. Employees' job position(s) were initially <br />categorised into positions with greater direct customer exposure <br />versus those without. In the sensitivity analysis, we categorised <br />the jobs into supervisory positions vs non -supervisory positions. <br />All p values reported are two -tailed. A p value <0.05 was <br />considered statistically significant. We used R software (V.3.6.3) <br />to conduct statistical analyses. <br />RESULTS <br />In table 1, we presented the characteristics of all tested employees <br />stratified by SARS-CoV-2 RT -PCR assay results. Among the 104 <br />Table 1 Characteristics of retail essential employees in a single grocery store in Massachusetts, USA by SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causing COVID-19) <br />RT -PCR assay testing results <br />Age, mean (SD) <br />Female, n N <br />Non -Caucasian, n (%) <br />Cigarette smoker, n (%) <br />Daily alcohol consumption, n (%) <br />Marijuana use, n (%) <br />Self-reported exposure to SARS-CoV-2-positive individual(s) in the past 14 days, n (%) <br />Job positions with direct customer exposure at storet, n (%) <br />Full-time employment status, n (%) <br />Residential area SARS-CoV-2 prevalence (per 100 000), geometric mean (geometric SD) <br />Ability to practice social distancing consistently at work, count (%) <br />Using gloves consistently at work, count (%) <br />Wearing face mask consistently at work, count (%) <br />Wearing face mask consistently outside of work, count (%) <br />Commute to work by foot, bike or private car <br />PPE knowledge score, median (IQR) <br />COVID-19 perception score, median (IQR) <br />GAD -7 score, median (IQR) <br />PHQ-9 score, median (IQR) <br />Employee has an assigned primary care provider, n (%) <br />Requested mental health support on survey, n (%) <br />Positive SARS-CoV-2 RT- Negative SARS-CoV-2 <br />Overall PCR assay RT -PCR assay <br />(N=104) (N=21) (N=83) Pvalue <br />49.0 (14.1) <br />49.2 (14.4) <br />49.0 (14.2) <br />0.954 <br />49(47.1%) <br />11 (52.4%) <br />38(45.8%) <br />0.767 <br />64(61.5%) <br />14(66.7%) <br />50(60.2%) <br />0.283 <br />25(24.0%) <br />1 (4.8%) <br />24(28.9%) <br />0.022* <br />8(7.7%) <br />0 <br />8(9.6%) <br />0.354* <br />1403.5%) <br />2 (9.5%) <br />12(14.5%) <br />0.730* <br />24(23.1%) <br />4(19.0%) <br />20(24.1%) <br />0.776* <br />68(65.4%) <br />19(90.5%) <br />49(59.0%) <br />0.009* <br />73(70.2%) <br />16(76.2%) <br />57(68.7%) <br />0.685 <br />1106.0 (1.5) <br />1292.8 (1.63) <br />1063.2 (1.4) <br />0.179# <br />69(66.3%) <br />13 (61.9%) <br />56(67.5%) <br />0.930 <br />80(76.9%) <br />19(90.5%) <br />61 (73.5%) <br />0.068* <br />95(91.3%) <br />20(95.2%) <br />75(90.4%) <br />0.596* <br />81 (77.9%) <br />18(85.7%) <br />63(75.9%) <br />0.348* <br />90(86.5%) <br />19(90.5%) <br />71 (85.5%) <br />0.730* <br />15(14-15) <br />15(14-15) <br />15(14-15) <br />0.966 t <br />12 (11-15) <br />13(11-15) <br />12(11-14) <br />0.510 t <br />0(0-4) <br />1 (0-4.5) <br />0 (0-4) <br />0.660# <br />0(0-2) <br />00-1) <br />0(0-2) <br />0.733# <br />77(74.0%) <br />17(81.0%) <br />60(72.3%) <br />0.584* <br />14(13.5%) <br />3(14.3%) <br />11 (13.3%) <br />0.999* <br />*Statistics derived from Fisher's exact test. <br />tDirect customer exposure positions include cashier, front end associate, sales associate, fresh food associate, cart attendant, janitorial crew, supervisor and manager of all levels. These are in <br />contrast to positions mainly dealing with consumer goods or the environment, such as stocker, backroom, receiving and maintenance. <br />#Statistics derived from Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction. <br />GAD -7, Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 -item scale; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire -9; PPE, personal protective equipment. <br />Lan F -Y, et al. Occup Environ Med 2021;78:237-243. doi:10.1136/oemed-2020-106774 239 <br />393 <br />0 <br />CD <br />n <br />(D <br />0- <br />n <br />0 <br />cQ� <br />