Laserfiche WebLink
7B <br /> Page 2 <br /> appliances, community design, accessibility, and inno�ations. Nonresidential buildings <br /> will typically use the "Leadership in Energy and Environmenta! Design" (LEED) green <br /> building rating system and be required to achieve the Certified level (Silver, Gold, and <br /> Platinum are higher levels). The LEED rating system operates similar to GreenPoint, but <br /> it is designed for nonresidential buildings, and the available points differ. <br /> The proposed Green Building Code is modeled after that adopted by the County of San <br /> Mateo on October 7, 2008. There are six jurisdi�tions in the county that have adopted <br /> green building codes; five use the county version as a basis. Severa( other jurisdic�ions <br /> are considering a version of the county code as this would promote regional <br /> consistency. One jurisdiction in the county has adopted the California Green Building <br /> Standards Code. The California code applies to residential occupancies only, is <br /> voluntary state-wide effective August 1, 2009, and is undergoing major revision prior to <br /> the intended mandatory effective date of January 2011. The Board of Building Re�iew <br /> discussed the alternatives of adopting the California Green Building Standards Code or <br /> ICC 700-20�8 National Green Building Standard (also cvvers residential construction <br /> only), or waiting for the development of the International Code Council Green Building <br /> Code, or delaying until January 2011 for the revised mandatory Cal'rfornia Green <br /> Building Standards Code. The Board recommends adoption of a green building code at <br /> this time and using the county code as a basis in order to foster regional consistency. <br /> The development community is embracing "green buiiding". Their customers are <br /> increasingly asking for green building elements such as proper building orientation, <br /> energy and water conservation, improved indoor air quality, recycled and sustainable <br /> products, and solar systems. Initially the industry perceived that green buiiding cost <br /> more than conventional construction. It has been demonstrated that green building <br /> construction can be less costly. The fonger-term benefits {utility cost savings, healthier <br /> jobsites for workers, improved indoor quality, and reduced impacts on the environment) <br /> demonstrate that green building is the best practice. <br /> Should the Council adopt the proposed Green Building Code, city staff will review <br /> project submit#als and conduct inspections for compliance with, rather than requiring the <br /> applicant to hire third-party reviewers and inspectors. Four Building Infrastructure <br /> Transportation Department staff members are already certified in the GreenPoint or <br /> LEED rating systems and others will be trained. The applican# may choose to achieve <br /> cert�cation from Build It Green or LEED for marketing or other reasons. For p�-ojects <br /> 10,00� square feet or greater, a GreenPoint Rater or LEED AP is required to verify that <br /> the project has been constructed in accordance with the approved green building <br /> project checklist. This requirement should no# be a hardship as most architectural, <br /> engineering, and contracting firms have staff with these credentials. <br /> Education is an important component to a successfi�l green building ordinance. The city <br /> website will be improved to have information and links to green building methods. <br /> Copies of the 20�9 Green Building Guidelines have been purchased and wiil be <br /> provided to city customers. Additional handouts on green building techniques will be <br /> developed. �taff is available to answer questions and provide assistance in complying <br /> with the proposed Green Building Code. <br />