My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res21 16010 final
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Res21 16010 final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 11:44:48 AM
Creation date
12/8/2021 11:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/6/2021
Description
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY ADOPTING ALL OF VOLUME 1 AND THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY PORTION OF VOLUME 2 THE SAN MATEO COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
822
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Earthquake <br /> <br />Table 10-8. Age of Housing Units in Planning Area <br /> <br /> <br />Time Period <br />Number of Current <br />Planning Area Housing <br />Units Built in Period <br />% of Total <br />Housing <br />Units <br /> <br /> <br />Significance of Time Frame <br />Pre-1933 15,588 8.0% Before 1933, there were no explicit earthquake requirements in building codes. <br />State law did not require local governments to have building officials or issue <br />building permits. <br />1933-1940 10,025 5.2% In 1940, the first strong motion recording was made. <br />1941-1960 87,547 45.1% In 1960, the Structural Engineers Association of California published guidelines <br />on recommended earthquake provisions. <br />1961-1975 40,454 20.8% In 1975, significant improvements were made to lateral force requirements. <br />1976-1994 24,970 12.9% In 1994, the Uniform Building Code was amended to include provisions for <br />seismic safety. <br />1994 – present 15,468 8.0% Seismic code is currently enforced. <br />Total 194,052 100% <br />Note: Number and percent estimates are approximation as housing unit age information does not correspond directly with the time periods <br />indicated. In addition, there are significant margins of error associated with the Census estimates. <br />Source: 2018 American Community Survey, San Mateo County, California <br /> <br />Soft-Story Buildings <br />A soft-story building is a multi-story building with one or more floors that are “soft” because of structural design. <br />If a building has a floor that is 70-percent less stiff than the floor above it, it is considered a soft-story building. <br />This soft story creates a major weak point in an earthquake. Since soft stories are typically associated with retail <br />spaces and parking garages, they are often on the lower stories of a building. When they collapse, they can take <br />the whole building down with them, causing serious structural damage that may render the structure unusable. <br /> <br />These floors can be especially dangerous in earthquakes because they cannot cope with the lateral forces caused <br />by the swaying of the building during a quake. As a result, the soft story may fail, causing what is known as a <br />soft-story collapse. Soft-story collapse is one of the leading causes of earthquake damage to private residences. <br /> <br />Exposure rates and vulnerability analysis associated with soft-story construction in the planning area are not <br />currently known. ABAG and other agencies in the Bay Area have programs generating this type of data, but it is <br />not known when such data will be available for San Mateo County. This type of data will need to be generated to <br />support future risk assessments of the earthquake hazard. <br /> <br />Unreinforced Masonry Buildings <br />Unreinforced masonry buildings are constructed from materials such as adobe, brick, hollow clay tiles, or other <br />masonry materials and do not contain an internal reinforcing structure, such as rebar in concrete or steel bracing <br />for brick. Unreinforced masonry buildings pose a significant danger during an earthquake because the mortar <br />holding masonry together is typically not strong enough to withstand significant earthquakes. Additionally, the <br />brittle composition of these houses can break apart and fall away or buckle, potentially causing a complete <br />collapse of the building. <br /> <br />In San Mateo County, unreinforced masonry buildings are generally brick buildings that were constructed before <br />modern earthquake building codes and designs were enacted. The State of California enacted a law in 1986 that <br />required all local governments in Seismic Zone 4 (nearest to active earthquake faults) to inventory unreinforced <br /> <br /> <br />10-21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.