My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res21 16010 final
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Res21 16010 final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 11:44:48 AM
Creation date
12/8/2021 11:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/6/2021
Description
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY ADOPTING ALL OF VOLUME 1 AND THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY PORTION OF VOLUME 2 THE SAN MATEO COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
822
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Table 2.0. Equity Screening Question Matrix <br />Evaluation Question Response <br />1. What issue/problem/risk is the action designed to address? And <br />what are the expected benefits? <br /> Issue: <br />Benefits: <br />2. Who is the target audience/beneficiary for this action? Who is <br />affected if no action is taken? <br /> <br />3. How would you classify the mitigation action? (Programs/Service; <br />Capital Investment; Regulation; Planning). Refer to questions in table <br />above based on your answer to this question. <br /> <br />4. Will any community groups be involved in the design/implementation <br />of this action? (i.e. potential partners) <br /> <br />5. Will this action reduce risk from natural hazards for the following groups? How? <br /> Communities of color <br />Persons with disabilities and/or access and functional needs <br />Households with limited English Proficiency <br />Renters <br />Economically disadvantaged families <br />Seniors (age 65 or older) <br />Children (under 15 years of age) <br />6. How could this action benefit the following groups? Or How could this action be modified so that there are benefits? <br /> Communities of color <br />Persons with disabilities and/or access and functional needs <br />Households with limited English Proficiency <br />Renters <br />Economically disadvantaged families <br />Seniors (age 65 or older) <br />Children (under 15 years of age) <br />7. How could this action burden/negatively impact/leave out the following groups, for example through communication, transportation, <br />physical or programmatic barriers? <br /> Communities of color <br />Persons with disabilities and/or access and functional needs <br />Households with limited English Proficiency <br />Renters <br />Economically disadvantaged families <br />Seniors (age 65 or older) <br />Children (under 15 years of age) <br />8. If you have identified burdens, barriers, or negative impacts, or <br />opportunities for benefits please revisit the action to identify strategies <br />to reduce or eliminate burdens or negative impacts; remove <br />communication, transportation, physical or programmatic barriers; or <br />enhance potential benefits. <br /> <br />9. Have you identified a performance metric for evaluating progress on <br />this action? How will you know when this action is complete? (please <br />provide) Have you considered outcomes for communities of color, <br />people with disabilities, low-income families, people with limited <br />English proficiency, renters, seniors, and children? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.