My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res21 16010 final
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Res21 16010 final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 11:44:48 AM
Creation date
12/8/2021 11:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/6/2021
Description
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY ADOPTING ALL OF VOLUME 1 AND THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY PORTION OF VOLUME 2 THE SAN MATEO COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
822
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />trust and their localized cultural expertise to support preparedness, response and to help community <br />members to prepare for current and coming climate impacts. They had many additional suggestions <br />reflected in the Emergency Planning, Evacuations, Shelters and other sections. <br />Evacuation <br />Community members wanted to be informed about evacuation plans, to be able to access the plans and <br />to be consulted in plan development. Participants with disabilities and medical needs indicated that <br />currently some individuals choose not to evacuate due to accessibility barriers and concerns. They <br />recommended coordinated evacuation of people with disabilities including disability community <br />oversight – key issues include accessibility to people with the full range of disabilities including non- <br />physical disabilities, access to power, escorting those who need assistance to shelters, medicines, <br />support network, transportation, and service / comfort animals. It was recommended to develop criteria <br />to aid evacuation prioritization (related to people with disabilities). <br />Further the need to address current every day, baseline conditions and institutional access barriers was <br />elevated as important to have in place to ensure access for evacuation for people with disabilities, older <br />adults, people with medical needs, such as: <br /> In all evacuation operations and communications including accessible transition from evacuation <br />to shelter and <br /> Through infrastructure improvements such as installing sidewalks, traffic islands and ramps and <br /> Through guidelines for signage, construction and other operations to eliminate temporary and <br />project-related barriers. <br />There was also concern about evacuation for transit-dependent people that is affordable accessible, and <br />at the needed times and places. A Senior Coastsiders’ program was mentioned as a best practice: a <br />buddy system pairing seniors or other community members who drive with those who don't in the <br />event of an emergency. There was concern that current traffic congestion would need to be decreased <br />to aid evacuation which was mentioned in Belle Haven/Menlo Park and on the Coastside, where there is <br />desire for additional ways to evacuate from the Coast. Coastal residents requested more local services, <br />such as shelter in place and outdoor sheltering options so transportation off the Coast is not needed. <br />Disability Access and Medical Needs <br />Comprehensive Access: Comprehensive disability access implementation was recommended including <br />new staff positions with detailed knowledge of how to help people with diverse disabilities including <br />non-physical disabilities, technology needs and legal rights. Dedicated staff and detailed training on <br />these topics for first responders and emergency personnel including shelter and cooling center staff was <br />also strongly recommended. Address current infrastructural and institutional access barriers, such as <br />related to sidewalks, buildings, construction, etc. to aid evacuation for people with disabilities, older <br />adults, people with medical needs during hazard events. <br />Additional accessibility needs included the following: <br /> Access to power including batteries with appropriate life span, back-up generators for people <br />who would have difficulty traveling, and hotel, and hotel rooms with power. <br /> Limited resources on the Coast was noted as a major challenge with a participant noting there <br />were no open gas stations and one hotel room using generator power during a PSPS event. <br /> Improving mechanisms for people to learn about where shelters are during an emergency that <br />addresses disability access, access for folks that can’t access the internet or phone system, and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.