Laserfiche WebLink
<br />78 <br /> <br />these four packets has been a very difficult one, especially in light of the reductions thePage 2 <br />City has made over the last several years. Should Council elect to implement the entire <br />amount of reductions ($2.8 million) a total of 17.57 positions will be eliminated from the <br />general fund and related funds. A summary of the values of each cumulative package <br />is shown below. Note that the packages are designed to be stacked one on top of <br />another in numeric sequence: For example, Package 2 is the sum of Package 1 and 2, <br />together - both in dollar value and in number of positions (FTE) reduced. <br /> <br />Package 1 <br />Package 1 & 2 <br />Package 11 21 & 3 <br />Package 1/2, 31 and 4 <br /> <br />Cumulative Totals <br />($943,715) <br />($1,460,011) <br />($1,932,031) <br />($2,770,725) <br /> <br />Total FTE's <br />8.27 <br />10.n <br />12.77 <br />17.57 <br /> <br />While extremely difficult, the process has also been a very deliberate and thoughtful <br />one, using the City's organizational values, council strategic initiatives and core service <br />areas to help guide the work. While each department head was clearly conscious of <br />potential cuts in hislher department, the decision-making process was based on what is <br />best for the entire organization as it moves forward, knowing that the City cannot do <br />business as usual but continues to seek to provide the best possible service at the best, <br />and most efficient possible price. <br /> <br />In developing the packages, the executive team considered many aspects and impacts <br />resulting from the proposed reductions. In Package 1 vacant positions have been <br />included where possible. While in some situations it made the most business sense to <br />eliminate a front-line service position, in other instances it made most sense to keep <br />such positions and eliminate a supervisory position. In the end, the executive team <br />believes that the four reduction packages are fair and equitable across the entire <br />organization. <br /> <br />It is important for the integrity of the reductions as proposed that the Council consider <br />each package as a whole, and if adding reductions is discussed, staff urges Council to <br />add packages sequentially and in their entirety. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1) If the City Council approved the proposed Proposition 1A Purchase and Sale <br />Agreement in order to participate in the Proposition 1A Securitization Program as <br />recommended in a separate, preceding staff report on this date, Council could <br />direct staff to return to Council on Nov. 9, 2009 with a resolution implementing <br />additional budget reductions described as "Packages 2, 3 or 4" herein. <br />2) If the City Council did not approve the proposed Proposition 1 A Purchase and <br />Sale Agreement in order to participate in the Proposition 1A Securitization <br />Program as recommended in a separate, preceding staff report on this date, <br />Council could direct staff to return to Council on Nov. 9, 2009 with a resolution <br />implementing budget reductions described as "Packages 1, 2,3 or 4" herein. <br />3) Council could direct staff to make no additional reductions to the Fiscal Year <br />2009/10 budget, and instead rely on further use of reserves in the current fiscal <br />year to cover the higher projected deficit. <br />