My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2022.03.07 Joint SA PFA_Amended
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
AgdaPkt 2022.03.07 Joint SA PFA_Amended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2022 4:03:24 PM
Creation date
3/22/2022 4:01:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/7/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\YCASTRO
Created:
3/22/2022 4:03 PM
Modified:
3/22/2022 4:03 PM
Text:
http://www.redwoodcity.org/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 12 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />The recent residential building boom has further set Redwood City back on its adopted ratio of 3 acres <br />per 1,000 residents. Redwood Shores has a high ratio of over 5 acres per 1,000 residents. The rest of <br />Redwood City has just over 1.75 acres per 1,000. <br />In the City’s first Park Needs Assessment that was completed in 2008, it showed there was 2.42 acres per <br />thousand residents for City-owned park land, and a total of 2.99 acres per thousand when including school <br />owned fields. In the 2019 Park Need Assessment, due to population increase, it went down to 2.25 acres <br />per thousand residents for City-owned park land, and a total of 2.78 acres per thousand when including <br />school owned fields. Today, the City needs a total of 62.26 acres of City-owned parkland to meet the <br />Quimby Act standard of 3 acres per thousand residents. It’s also important to note that though the City <br />and the Redwood City School District has an excellent partnership and a joint use of facilities in place, the <br />school owned fields are only available after school and on weekends for use. <br />In November 2019, staff and representatives from MIG and EPS presented the completed Park Needs <br />Assessment; draft 2020 Nexus Study and the benchmark report to the Parks, Recreation and Community <br />Services (PRCS) Commission. The PRCS Commission unanimously recommended that staff proceed with <br />the process of updating the residential parks impact fee and Quimby Act fees, and implement a <br />new nonresidential parks impact fee consistent with the nexus findings and benchmark analysis. <br />The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission reviewed the maximum fee calculations in <br />the draft updated Nexus study at their August 25, 2021 meeting and unanimously recommended adoption <br />of the update residential and non-residential fees at 100% levels. The Commission notes that the <br />Benchmark Study of neighboring cities demonstrates that Redwood City would remain in the middle in <br />almost all cases and no higher than number 2 in one single category. <br />On September 28, 2021, the State of California adopted Assembly Bill No. 602 (AB 602), Development <br />Fees: Impact Fee Nexus Study. Beginning January 1, 2022, AB 602 imposes new requirements on cities <br />preparing impact fee nexus studies. These requirements include: identifying the existing and proposed <br />new level of service for each public facility, and explaining why any new level of service is appropriate; if <br />the nexus study supports increasing fees, the city’s review of the original nexus study fee assumptions <br />and evaluation of the amount of fees collected under the original fee; and adoption of a capital <br />improvement plan as part of the nexus study. Additionally, beginning on July 1, 2022, AB 602 sets a new <br />method for calculating fees. <br />The City’s consultant prepared an initial nexus study in 2020. The consultant has since updated the study <br />based on new 2020 census data, and the study is further being revised due to AB 602’s requirements <br />applicable as of January 1, 2022. Staff will come back to the City Council with a final nexus study for its <br />consideration and adoption. If Council does not adopt the final nexus study before July 1, 2022, the study <br />would need further revisions to ensure compliance with the deferred provisions of AB 602 and adoption <br />of the study and fee updates would be further delayed. <br />To avoid further delays in consideration of the Nexus Study and fee updates, staff is requesting feedback <br />from Council at this time. The discussion of the draft nexus study, and its current maximum fee <br />calculations, are to assist Council in providing individual input on development of the fees. The maximum <br />fee calculations may be subject to change in final nexus study. <br />7.A. - Page 3 of 66 <br />115
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.