Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.28 <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />REPORT <br /> <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the Ci Mana er <br /> <br />October 26, 2009 <br /> <br />SUBJECT <br />1998 City Hall Variable Rate Certificates of Participation <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />By resolution, authorize the Finance Director to payoff all remaining debt associated <br />with the 1998 City Hall variable rate certificates of participation. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />In September 1998 the City Council authorized the issuance of $11.7 million of variable <br />rate certificates of participation (COPs) to reimburse the City for the cost of constructing <br />City Hall. The final maturity of this debt is July 2021. This action was taken to provide <br />increased liquidity and the opportunity to generate interest earnings on the proceeds of <br />the debt issue that exceeded the on-going interest expenses of such. The City's COPs <br />are a financial instrument representing fractional ownership interests in lease payments <br />made by the City for the use of City Hall. To securitize its lease, the City sold City Hall to <br />the Redwood City Public Finance Authority (PFA) which then leased City Hall back to <br />the City. The lease payments that the City makes to the PFA are then transferred by <br />the PFA via a Trustee (U.S. Bank) and converted to principal and interest payments to <br />the parties owning the COPs. <br /> <br />The City used available cash balances to construct City Hall, but because the City <br />passed a timely resolution stating its intention to reimburse itself with the proceeds of <br />COPs, the U.S. Treasury Department considered the COPs proceeds as spent once <br />they were used to reimburse the City for its construction expenditures. The City has <br />retained its reimbursement of the cost of constructing City Hall and invested the <br />balance. <br /> <br />At the time the COPs were issued it was determined that variable rate COPs (in this <br />case the interest rate on the COPs changes weekly) would be the most advantageous <br />to the City as the COPs can be redeemed at anytime without paying a premium to the <br />COPs owners and because the City could invest the proceeds used to reimburse the <br />City in a variable rate investment, such as the State Local Agency Investment Fund <br />(LAIF) or the County of San Mateo Investment Pool, that generally paid higher interest <br />than and moved in the same direction as the weekly tax-exempt interest rates. <br />Investing the proceeds in a short-term variable rate investment limited the risk that the <br />interest rate paid on the COPs would exceed the interest rate earned on the proceeds. <br /> <br />An integral element of variable rate COPs (or bonds) is the need to have a letter of <br />credit (LOC) from a bank, with an investment grade rating, to additionally secure the <br />