Laserfiche WebLink
from Redwood City. Mayor Foust commented that she could not impose this level of <br /> specificity on the document. There was no consensus on adding this level of <br /> specificity; consequently it was asked that this come back for a future vote. <br /> One Council Member appreciated the principles but wanted measurable ways to handle <br /> the fiscal balance. Another Council Member thanked staff and Stanford for their hard work <br /> but reiterated that looking at the fiscal impact is important carefully looked at. This Council <br /> Member wants a process that creates a beautiful site but also includes the concept of <br /> making the community whole. It was requested that Council be kept informed of the <br /> progress and include some sort of check in to help Council stay connected. It was <br /> suggested that on bullet #5 it could be left at community and exclude the word city. On <br /> the issue of the period check-ins Mayor Foust asked City Attorney Yamamoto to comment <br /> and he said that with the negotiations going on that might be a little harder but it may be <br /> doable. <br /> Mayor Foust asked for next steps and Ms. Riordan provided a tentative timeline. The <br /> issue of a community task force was brought up and this may be part of future <br /> discussions. Mayor Foust clarified that when the term "community" is used it should be all- <br /> inclusive and broad to include organizations such as Redwood City 2020 and other <br /> partners. <br /> M/S Pierce/Hartnett to approve the Guiding Principles for Stanford in Redwood City <br /> Project. Motion carried unanimously by electronic vote. <br /> Mayor Foust announced a break at 9:01 p.m. and the meeting resumed at 9:15 p.m. <br /> B. Draft New General Plan — City Council Direction. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Review and reach consensus on the Introduction Chapter of the Draft New <br /> General Plan and other revisions. (601) <br /> Tom Passanisi, Principal Planner, introduced the item and referred to a revised <br /> attachment Goal BE-22. He provided clarity on what staff is seeking from Council and <br /> upcoming steps prior to the General Plan's adoption. He added that staff is sifting through <br /> close to 500 public comments that were submitted. Jill Ekas, Planning Manager, provided <br /> details on a map that showed Revisions to the New General Plan Land Use Map <br /> (presentation on file). <br /> Council made comments on the document and the consultant was present to capture <br /> these. It was suggested that the plan refer to the goal that "Redwood City will provide". <br /> One Council Member asked about the legacy statement in the plan and its origin. Ms. <br /> Ekas read the original statement that Mayor Foust had made at a prior comment session <br /> and how it morphed into the current wording. Some of the more specific comments from <br /> Council included: 1) use varied pictures without repetition, 2) and improve depiction on <br /> page three. <br /> Public Comment <br /> SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 21, 2009 <br /> MEETING MINUTES PAGE 5 <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 62 <br /> Page No. 481 <br />