Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WHEREAS, in light of the delays associated with the lengthy negotiations around the <br />Tri-Party Agreement and the substantial disruptions, including supply chain disruptions, <br />resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, Developer has requested a three year extension of the <br />5-year Initial Term of the Development Agreement in exchange for Developer waiving force <br />majeure related claims that might otherwise have been applicable prior to the date of the Third <br />Amendment (defined below), with the exception of the Litigation Force Majeure Delay; and <br />WHEREAS, Developer and City desire to enter into a Third Amendment to Development <br />Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (“Third Amendment”) to, among other <br />things, acknowledge the Litigation Force Majeure Delay, extend the 5-year Initial Term of the <br />Development Agreement by three (3) years to a total of 8 years in light of the above described <br />delays in implementing the Project such that the Initial Term will now expire 8 years from the <br />Effective Date of the Development Agreement, provide Developer the flexibility to phase <br />construction of the Bay Trail with the townhome units fronting said Bay Trail on the condition <br />that Developer ensure continuous pedestrian and bicycle access via the Blomquist bike lanes <br />during periods that the planned Bay Trail is closed for construction; and <br />WHEREAS, the Third Amendment is a major amendment requiring a public hearing <br />before the City Council because it extends the Term of the Development Agreement; and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867, notices of the <br />public hearing for this ordinance were mailed to the owner of the Property and all owners of real <br />property shown on the latest equalized assessment roll within 300 feet of the Property at least <br />ten (10) days prior to the hearing and a notice was published in the San Mateo Daily Journal at <br />least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and <br />WHEREAS, on ___________, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing at which time <br />interested persons had an opportunity to provide comments on the proposed Third Amendment. <br />NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY DOES <br />HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: <br />SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby <br />incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth in their entirety. <br />SECTION 2. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65867.5 and 65868, <br />the City Council finds that: <br />(a) The provisions of the Third Amendment are consistent with the general plan and <br />any applicable specific plan. <br />Basis for the finding: The Third Amendment links the timing of construction of the Bay <br />Trail with the timing of construction for the residential units to ensure that City receives this <br />amenity close in time to completion of residential units that it would serve. The Development <br />Agreement also continues to provide for Developer’s construction of all three segments of the <br />Blomquist Street extension. The Bay Trail and Blomquist Street extension are consistent with <br />general plan policy BE29.9; support increasing the connectivity of all travel modes in the areas <br />east of US 101, Program BE -68; develop plans to extend Blomquist Street to East Bayshore <br />Road to provide a continuous roadway east of US 101 between Woodside Road and Whipple <br />Avenue interchanges, Policy BE -10. 1; require waterfront neighborhoods provide public access <br />along water edges to public open spaces and trails and to vista points, as integral parts of <br />ATTY/RESO.0030/PC RESO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMEND.NO.3 TO THE 1548 MAPLE DA <br />REV: 04-17-2023 VR <br /> <br />Page 5 of 13