Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0034/PC RESO RECOMMENDING CEQA APPROVAL – 505 E. BAYSHORE – EXHIBIT B <br />REV: 05-12-23 JB <br />Page 21 of 22 <br />Conditions of Approval <br />505 East Bayshore Road Project (SCH #2021080447) <br />Aesthetics <br />• General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 4.1-5: All new development and redevelopment shall be in compliance with Title 24 Lighting Zone (LZ-3) <br />requirements and submit lighting and photometric site plans for City review and approval prior to issuance of individual building permits. <br /> <br />Cultural Resources <br />• General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 4.5-1b: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant is responsible for ensuring all construction <br />crews undergo adequate training for the identification of federal or state-eligible cultural resources, and that the construction crews are aware of the <br />potential for previously undiscovered archaeological resources, of the laws protecting these resources and associated penalties, and of the procedures <br />to follow should they discover cultural resources during project-related work. <br /> <br />• General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 4.5-1a: If deposits of prehistoric or historic archeological materials are encountered during project construction <br />activities, all work within an appropriate buffer area (no less than 50 feet) around the discovery shall be stopped and a qualified archeologist meeting <br />federal criteria under 36 CFR 61 shall be contacted to assess the deposit(s) and make recommendations. If the deposits are recommended to be non- <br />significant by a qualified archeologist, avoidance is not necessary. If the deposits are determined to be potentially significant by the qualified <br />archeologist, the resources shall be avoided. If avoidance is not feasible, project impacts shall be mitigated in accordance with the recommendations <br />of the qualified archaeologist, in coordination with the City Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Department and CEQA Guidelines <br />Section 15126.4 (b)(3)(C), which requires implementation of a data recovery plan. The data recovery plan shall be prepared and implemented by a <br />qualified archaeologist. The data recovery plan shall include provisions for adequately recovering all scientifically consequential information from <br />and about any discovered archeological materials and include recommendations for the treatment of these resources. In-place preservation of the <br />archeological resource is the preferred manner of mitigating potential impacts, as it maintains the relationship between the resource and the <br />archeological context. In-place preservation also reduces the potential for conflicts with the religious or cultural values of groups associated with the <br />resource. Other mitigation options include, but are not limited to, the full or partial removal and curation of the resource. The data recovery plan shall <br />be conducted prior to any additional earth-moving activities in the area of the resource. The recovery plan shall be submitted to the project applicant, <br />the City Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Department, and the Northwest Information Center (NWIC). Once the recovery plan is <br />reviewed and approved by the City Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Department and any appropriate resource recovery completed, <br />project construction activity within the area of the find may resume. A data recovery plan shall not be required for resources that have been deemed <br />by the NWIC as adequately recorded and recovered by studies already completed.2 <br /> <br /> <br />2 Redwood City. A New General Plan for Redwood City Draft Environmental Impact Report. May 2010. Certified October 2010. Pages 4.5-23 and 4.5-24.