My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso 23-10 PC Reso 0035 Reso Recommending General Plan Amendment Approval - 505 E. Bayshore
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
Reso 23-10 PC Reso 0035 Reso Recommending General Plan Amendment Approval - 505 E. Bayshore
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2023 3:59:58 PM
Creation date
6/22/2023 3:59:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
5/16/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTY/RESO.0035/PC RESO RECOMMENDING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVAL - 505 E. BAYSHORE <br />REV: 05-12-23 JB <br />Page 8 of 32 <br />The project site is flat and located in an urban environment for which <br />all public utilities and services are already established, and the development <br />is consistent with the standards for the proposed General Plan and Zoning <br />District. <br /> <br />iii. The design or proposed improvements are not likely to cause <br />substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure <br />fish, wildlife, or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems. <br /> <br />The site is currently developed with several corrugated metal warehouse <br />buildings and outdoor storage facilities associated with an existing industrial <br />facility. The remainder of the site is an undeveloped vacant lot. The proposal <br />improves the existing conditions redeveloping the site and the environmental <br />impact report found that the existing conditions were not well suited to <br />provide habitat for substantial numbers of species. <br /> <br />iv. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will <br />not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, <br />property within the proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate public <br />easements will be provided. <br /> <br />The proposed subdivision and associated improvements will not <br />conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, <br />property within the proposed subdivision. Additionally, the project site does <br />not have any public utilities or associated improvements that would be in <br />conflict with the proposed project. <br /> <br />v. The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions <br />applied for comply with requirements for findings described in Section <br />30.69, and the tentative map is deemed not workable without the granting <br />of such exceptions. <br /> <br />No exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance are requested. <br /> <br />vi. Such other findings conflict with written public policy or with the <br />public interest as the Planning Commission may determine. <br /> <br />The proposed project does not conflict with any written public policy <br />or with the public interest. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.