My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt09 San Francisco City and County of Water Sales Agreement
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Agmt09 San Francisco City and County of Water Sales Agreement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2025 3:35:04 PM
Creation date
10/29/2009 12:43:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
San Francisco, City and County of
PROJECT NAME
Water Sales Agreement
RMP File Number
304
Date
7/1/2009
Reso Ref
14949, 15255
Amendment
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
90 <br />2021 Amended and Restated WSA 17162043.1 <br />Sales Contract. The SFPUC will give the Wholesale Customers notice of any proposal to <br />amend the Rules and Regulations in a manner that would affect the Wholesale Customers. The <br />notice will be delivered at least thirty days in advance of the date on which the proposal is to be <br />considered by the Commission and will be accompanied by the text of the proposed <br />amendment. <br />8.07. Reservations of, and Limitations on, Claims <br />A. General Reservation of Raker Act Contentions. The 1984 Agreement <br />resolved a civil action brought against San Francisco by certain of the Wholesale Customers. <br />Plaintiffs in that action contended that they, and other Wholesale Customers that are <br />municipalities or special districts, were “co-grantees” within the meaning of Section 8 of the Act <br />and were entitled to certain rights, benefits and privileges by virtue of that status. San Francisco <br />disputed those claims. <br />Nothing in this Agreement, or in the Individual Water Sales Contracts, shall be construed <br />or interpreted in any way to affect the ultimate resolution of the controversy between the parties <br />concerning whether any of the Wholesale Customers are “co-grantees” under the Act and, if so, <br />what rights, benefits and privileges accrue to them by reason of that claimed status. <br />B. Claims Reserved but not Assertable During Term or Portions Thereof. The <br />following claims, which San Francisco disputes, are reserved but may not be asserted during <br />the Term (or portions thereof, as indicated): <br />1. The Wholesale Customers’ claim that the Act entitles them to water at <br />cost. <br />2. The Wholesale Customers’ claim that San Francisco is obligated under <br />the Act or state law to supply them with additional water in excess of the Supply Assurance. <br />This claim may not be asserted unless and until San Francisco decides not to meet projected <br />water demands of Wholesale Customers in excess of the Supply Assurance pursuant to Section <br />4.06. <br />3. The claim by San Jose and Santa Clara that they are entitled under the <br />Act, or any other federal or state law, to permanent, non-interruptible status and to be charged <br />rates identical to those charged other Wholesale Customers. This claim may not be asserted <br />unless and until San Francisco notifies San Jose or Santa Clara that it intends to interrupt or <br />terminate water deliveries pursuant to Section 4.05.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.