Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments 22 ESA / 202100421.01 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report May 2023 <br />Impact HAZ-6: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not impair <br />implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or <br />emergency evacuation plan. <br />Since certification of the DTPP Final EIR, the City has implemented signal prioritization <br />at 15 intersections in the Downtown, including around Fire Station No. 9 on Marshall Street. This <br />signal prioritization for emergency vehicles combined with the ability of first responders to use <br />vehicle lights and sirens would mean that the increased volumes would not substantially impair <br />emergency response. In addition, the urban character of the surrounding area, with a grid of local <br />streets providing multiple access and egress routes in event of an emergency, would mean that the <br />increased volumes would not substantially impair emergency evacuation. Impacts of the proposed <br />DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not result in new or more severe impacts than t he impacts <br />identified in the DTPP Final EIR because the DTPP Final EIR Mitigation Measure 8-1 has already <br />been implemented, and the project does not add any new signals. Therefore, impacts would be less <br />than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 14-12 to 14-13.) <br />Impact HAZ-7: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not expose <br />people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death <br />involving wildland fires. <br />Future developments within the amended DTPP area would include construction activities, <br />which would require the use some flammable substances which can be inadvertently ignited. New <br />development may also use flammable substances. However, state and local laws are in effect that <br />are intended to reduce the ignition and spread of wildfire. The amended DTPP area is within an <br />urbanized area of the city and not within an established Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone <br />(VHFHSZ), or immediately adjacent to a VHFHSZ where wildfire is considered a hazard. For these <br />reasons, the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not result in new impacts and would <br />be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, p. 14-13.) <br />15. Biological Resources <br />Impact BIO-6: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not conflict with <br />the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation <br />Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. <br />No adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other <br />approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan applies to the amended DTPP area. <br />Consequently, there would be no impact from implementation of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide <br />Amendments. (Draft SEIR, p. 15-16.)