Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments 30 ESA / 202100421.01 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report May 2023 <br />in the DSEIR, as incorporated into the FSEIR, and makes the following findings with respect to <br />such potentially significant impacts. <br />6. Aesthetics and Shadows <br />Impact AE-5: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not cast shadow <br />that would substantially impair the beneficial use, important values, or livability of any <br />shadow-sensitive use, including public parks, plazas or open space areas; buildings using <br />passive solar heat collection or solar collectors; historic resources with a shadow-sensitive <br />character-defining feature; or shadow-sensitive portions of residential parcels. <br />Mitigation Measures. SEIR Mitigation Measure AE-5 (SEIR, p. 6-14) will be <br />implemented for the Project as provided in the MMRP. <br />Findings Regarding Impact AE-5: Based on the FSEIR and the entire record before the <br />City, the Council finds that incorporating the requirements of Mitigation Measure AE-5 <br />into the Project would substantially lessen the severity of Impact AE-5, such that this <br />impact would be less than significant. The proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would <br />allow for exceptions to building placement and/or building height and disposition <br />regulations in the DTPP that would allow greater building massing than would otherwise <br />be permitted. However, Mitigation Measure AE-5 would require each discretionary <br />development project applicant seeking such exceptions to demonstrate that the exceptions <br />would be consistent with Section 2.7.5 of the DTPP and would not result in shadow <br />exceeding 50 percent on the shadow-sensitive uses and spaces identified therein at noon <br />on the Spring Equinox.(This requirement would not apply to Downtown parcels with lower <br />maximum permitted building heights adjacent to parcels with higher maximum permitted <br />heights if the parcel(s) with lower height limits are the site of development subsequent to <br />DTPP adoption.) <br />7. Cultural and Historic Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources <br />Impact CR-1: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not cause a <br />substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section <br />15064.5. <br />Mitigation Measures. SEIR Mitigation Measures CR-1, CR-2, and NO-3 (SEIR, pp. 7-18 <br />to 7-21) will be implemented for the Project as provided in the MMRP. <br />Findings Regarding Impact CR-1: Based on the FSEIR and the entire record before the <br />City, the Council finds that incorporating the requirements of Mitigation Measures CR-1, <br />CR-2, and NO-3 into the Project would lessen the severity of Impact CR-1, but not <br />sufficiently so that this impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure CR-1 <br />would require that, for each discretionary development project involving a historical <br />resource in the amended DTPP area, the City would make a preliminary determination as <br />to the potential for a significant adverse effect on the historic resource and, if such a <br />determination is made, the applicant would be required to implement, as feasible, as step - <br />wise series of measures including 1) compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s