My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso23-14 Reso 0048 PC23-14 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR GP & DTPP
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
Reso23-14 Reso 0048 PC23-14 PC Reso Recommending Certification of the SEIR GP & DTPP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2023 12:11:27 PM
Creation date
8/16/2023 12:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments 48 ESA / 202100421.01 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report May 2023 <br />creek or stormwater features, or that provide publicly accessible open space as identified by <br />the City, to building placement requirements (i.e., build-to-corner, building setback, and <br />frontage coverage requirements) to allow corner setbacks, other setbacks from the street, and <br />lesser lot coverage than is currently required; permitting limited exceptions to the stepdown <br />requirements; and lowering the required minimum heights from 35 feet to two stories, with a <br />range of 25 to 35 feet, or less with a potential exception. <br />B. Significant Environmental Impacts of the Project <br />Based on the analyses in Chapters 4 through 17 of the DSEIR, the City has determined that <br />all of the proposed Project’s potentially significant environmental effects would be avoided or <br />reduced to less-than-significant levels through implementation of the mitigation measures <br />described in the DSEIR and MMRP, except for the following: <br />• Impact CR-1: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would potentially cause <br />a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursu ant to Section <br />15064.5. <br />• Impact AQ-2: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would result in a <br />cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the project region is non- <br />attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. <br />• Impact CC-1: Implementation of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would generate <br />greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on <br />the environment. <br />• Impact CC-2: Implementation of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would not <br />conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the <br />emissions of greenhouse gases. <br />• Impact C-CR-1: The proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in combination with past, <br />present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would <br />potentially result in significant cumulative impacts related to cultural, historic, and tribal <br />cultural resources. <br />• Impact C-AQ-1: Adoption of the proposed DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments would result in a <br />cumulatively considerable contribution to the regional cumulative air quality impacts. <br />• Impact C-CC-1: Implementation of the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments, in combination with <br />past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, could <br />result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to GHG emissions that may have a <br />significant impact on the environment or conflict with applicable plans, policies, or regulations <br />adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. <br />C. Project Alternatives Descriptions <br />Through the environmental review process, the City identified the following three (3) <br />Project alternatives for consideration: <br />No Project Alternative. The No Project/Existing DTPP Alternative would not assume <br />increased development in the DTPP area beyond that permitted under the existing development caps.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.