Agmt23 BKF Engineers Price Tract Pump Station

Browse Search

REV: 11-07-23 SK • Air impact analysis (Clean Air Act, as amended, particularly section 176(c) & (d); 40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93) • Section 106 Consultation and noticing (National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, particularly sections 106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800) • Environmental Justice (Executive Order 12898) • Socioeconomic and community factors • Analysis of alternatives • Preparation of required public notices MIG will utilize industry standard screening and analytical techniques to determine the extent of the effects of the project on the human environment that may result from the project and applicable mitigation, where necessary. The information provided in the EA will be submitted to USACE for review, approval, and use in completing the environmental review process pursuant to 24 CFR 50. Based on the scope of the project, preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not anticipated for this project. Should it be determined through unforeseen circumstances that an EIS is needed, the scope of work, budget, and schedule contained herein will need to be revisited and revised. Task deliverables: EA, EAFONSI, NOI to Request Release of Funds. • Project Management: The MIG Senior Project Manager will be the point of contact with Consultant and the City and will keep Consultant and the City apprised of project progress. If issues arise that will affect the schedule or budget, the Senior Project Manager will immediately inform Consultant and discuss the best approach to resolving issues. MIG has allocated budget for client communication and staff coordination to ensure Consultant can communicate clearly and effectively. Additionally, this budget covers implementing Consultant’s quality control review process and administrative time for contracting. • Cultural Resources Due Diligence. BASIN will: (1) develop an Area of Potential Effects(APE) map to meet USACE requirements; (2) request an archival records search of a 0.25 mile radius of the project alignment to be completed by the California Historical Resources Information System, Northwest Information Center (CHRIS/NWIC) to determine the presence of any previously recorded cultural resources within the proposed work area; (3) request a review of the Sacred Lands Inventory (SLF) from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to determine if any potential resources of interest to the Native American community are present; (4) conduct Native American outreach to parties listed by the NAHC; and, (5) undertake a field review of the project area. BASIN has included a field review to check for cultural resources as the USACE requires a physical inventory of properties that have not been reviewed and/or a site conditions update. BASIN is very familiar with the ATTY/AGR.2023.241/BKF Engineers (Price Tract Pump Station Design) (Page 38 of 68)