Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7 <br />Page <br /> <br />1 The Water Code requires the Regional Water Board, when issuing NPDES pennits, to <br />2 implement "any relevant water quality control plans that have been adopted, and shall take into <br />3 consideration the beneficial uses to be protected, the water quality objectives reasonably required for <br />4 that purpose, other waste discharges, the need to prevent nuisance, and the provisions of Section <br /> <br />5 13241." Water Code ~ 13263(a). Section 13241 requires the consideration ofa number of factors, <br /> <br /> <br />6 including technical feasibility and economic considerations. Id. ~ 13241. <br /> <br /> <br />7 Courts have read these provisions together to mean that the Regional Water Board cannot rely <br /> <br /> <br />8 on the requirement for consideration of economic conditions under section 13241 as justification for <br /> <br />9 imposing conditions that are less stringent than those required under the federal Act. City of Burbank <br /> <br />10 v. State Water Resources Control Bd., 35 Cal. 4th 613,626-27 (2005). However, nothing in the <br /> <br />11 federal or state statutory scheme prohibits consideration of economic factors in fashioning permits <br /> <br />12 that meet federal standards. Id. at 629 (J. Brown, concurring). And as implied by the remand order <br /> <br /> <br />13 issued by the court in the City of Burbank, sections 13236 and 13241 together require that economic <br /> <br /> <br />14 factors must be considered when imposing conditions that exceed federal requirements. Id. at 627 <br /> <br />15 n.8 & 629 (remanding to the trial court "to decide whether any numeric limitations, as described in <br /> <br /> <br />16 the permits, are 'more stringent' than required under federal law and thus should have been subject to <br /> <br />17 'economic considerations' by the Los Angeles Regional Board before inclusion in the permits"). <br />18 Pennit conditions that are imposed pursuant to state law reaching beyond the mandatory <br />19 requirements of the federal Clean Water Act would also trigger review of their environmental impact <br />20 under the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Res. Code ~ 21000 et seq. ("CEQA,,).6 <br /> <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br /> <br />6 Issuance of NPD ES permits as required to implement the Clean Water Act are exempt from <br />CEQA's requirement of preparation of an environmental impact report for all projects that are <br />expected to have a significant environmental impact. Water Code 9 13389. But municipal storm <br />water permits that contain provisions exceeding the "maximum extent practicable" standard set by <br />the federal Clean Water Act fall outside the exemption established by section 13389. <br /> <br />sf~2748053 <br /> <br />5 <br />PETITION FOR REVIEW <br />