Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0056/PC RESO 227 KING STREET <br />REV: 06-26-2020 PR <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br />3. In upholding the Zoning Administrator’s decision, the Planning Commission is able <br />make the required findings for approval of an Architectural Permit (Zoning Ordinance <br />Section 45.4). Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that: <br /> <br />A. The existence of sufficient variety in the design of the structure and <br />grounds to avoid monotony in the external appearance; <br /> <br />The Revised Project continues to utilize a variety of methods to avoid monotony in <br />the elevations. The design includes a covered porch entry, varied roof heights, <br />stepbacks and additional setbacks on the second floor to break up the massing of <br />the two-story structure. The Craftsman architectural style is also applied <br />consistently on each elevation to create a cohesive design. <br /> <br />B. The size and design of the structure shall be considered for the <br />purpose of determining that the structure is in proportion to its building site <br />and that it has a balance and unity among its external features so as to <br />present a harmonious appearance; <br /> <br />The proposed house meets all applicable development standards for massing <br />including setbacks, height and lot coverage and is designed to be proportional to <br />the site. The project provides adequate building articulation because it is broken up <br />with varying roof heights and the second story incorporates stepbacks to further <br />reduce the apparent mass and bulk. In addition, all of the roof pitches, slopes, and <br />materials are consistent throughout each elevation to present a balanced <br />harmonious appearance. When compared to the previous design, the height has <br />been reduced and the garage and house have been further setback to further <br />break up the massing and make the structure more proportional to the building <br />site. <br /> <br />C. The extent to which the structure conforms to the general character of <br />other structures in the vicinity insofar as the character can be ascertained <br />and is found to be architecturally desirable; <br /> <br />The Revised Project is consistent with the development pattern of the <br />neighborhood which consists of a combination one and two-story single family <br />houses. A map of one-story and two-story homes surrounding the subject property <br />attached to the February 4, 2020 staff report illustrates the mixture of one- and <br />two-story residences. Approximately half of the lots on the northwest end of the <br />block are two-stories, as well as the adjacent home to the south. <br /> <br />The revised design of the house is consistent with the Neighborhood Compatibility <br />Guiding Principles, Streetscape Frontage and Massing and Design. Relating to <br />streetscape frontage, the project incorporates a covered front entry porch <br />compatible with defined front entries in the neighborhood. The proposed home <br />provides an additional front yard setback for the garage of 31 feet, 6 inches where <br />20 feet is required and 37 foot setback for the main house, where 15 feet is