Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 16 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />Impact UT-7: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater <br />recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the <br />basin. <br />The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments do not propose the use of groundwater <br />supply, and would redevelop an already urbanized area so that the amount of impervious surfaces <br />would remain essentially the same. For these reasons, the impacts on groundwater resulting from <br />the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would be similar to those identified in the DTPP <br />Final EIR and would not result in new or more severe impacts. The impact would be less than <br />significant. (Draft SEIR, p. 10-37.) <br />Impact UT-8: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, <br />in a manner which would: (i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; <br />(ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result <br />in flooding on- or off-site; (iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the <br />capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial <br />additional sources of polluted runoff; (iv) impede or redirect flood flows. <br />Future development under the proposed the Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />replace existing developed area, and proposed infrastructure improvements would be within <br />existing rights of way and subject to City review, ensuring no substantial changes to drainage <br />patterns. As a result, the impacts from the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would be <br />similar to those identified in the DTPP Final EIR and would not result in new or more severe <br />impacts. The impact would be less than significant. (Draft SEIR, p. 10-38.) <br />Impact UT-9: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not result in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project <br />inundation. <br />The Transit District area is not within a tsunami zone or in an area at risk of inundation <br />from a seiche. Therefore, tsunami and seiche related impacts would be less than significant. Further, <br />the Transit District area is not within the 100-year flood zone, so flood-related risks would also be <br />less than significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 10-38.) <br />Impact UT-10: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable <br />groundwater management plan. <br />The proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not use groundwater supply, and <br />future developments would not increase the amount of impervious surfaces. For these reasons, and <br />because the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would subject to applicable City, <br />County, and RWQCB requirements (including preparation of a SWPPP), the potential impacts from <br />the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments to water quality control plans and sustainable <br />groundwater management plans would not result in new or more severe impacts than what was