Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 18 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />Impact AQ-4: Adoption of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not result <br />in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number <br />of people. <br />Land uses proposed as part of the Transit District DTPP Amendments would not include <br />any major sources of odor that would adversely affect a substantial number of people and would <br />not result in new or more severe impacts than the impacts identified in the DTPP Final EIR. The <br />impact would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. (Draft SEIR, <br />pp. 12-41 to 12-42.) <br />13. Climate Change <br />Impact CC-3: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during <br />project construction and operation or conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for <br />renewable energy or energy efficiency. <br />Overall, construction activities that would be required as part of implementation of the <br />proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not be unusual as compared to overall local <br />and regional demand for energy resources and would not involve characteristics that require <br />equipment that would be less energy-efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region <br />or state. Therefore, the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not result in the <br />inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy during construction. In terms of <br />building operational efficiency, proposed development in the Transit District area would be <br />required to be all-electric with no natural gas infrastructure, which eliminates natural gas usage <br />onsite. Applicants of subsequent project would also be required to ensure that proposed <br />development would meet Title 24 requirements applicable at that time, as required by state <br />regulations through their plan review process. Given that the location of the Transit District area <br />is proximate to transit facilities reduces VMT within the region, acting to also reduce regional <br />vehicle energy demand, the Transit District DTPP Amendments’ transportation energy <br />consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary and the <br />proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would be consistent with regulations to reduce <br />transportation energy use. Considering these factors and requirements, energy use associated with <br />the construction and operation of development proposed within the Transit District area would not <br />be considered unnecessary and wasteful and would be consistent with all applicable plans, policies <br />and regulations developed to encourage energy conservation and renewable energy use. Therefore, <br />the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would not result in new or more severe impacts <br />than what was previously identified in the DTPP Final EIR. this impact would be less than <br />significant. (Draft SEIR, pp. 13-41 to 13-45.) <br />Impact CC-4: Implementation of the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would <br />not exacerbate effects of sea level rise. <br />All future development under the proposed Transit District DTPP Amendments would be <br />consistent with the City’s GHG reduction goals and meet the BAAQMD’s adopted thresholds for <br />GHG emissions, which require project design elements to include no natural gas in residential and