Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Harbor View Project PAGE 11 OF 48 ESA / 170951 <br />Final Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />ATTY/RESO.0085/PC RESO RECOMMENDING CEQA – EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 11-02-2022 VR <br />4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br /> <br />Impact HAZ-2: Disturbance and release of hazardous structural and building components <br />(i.e., asbestos, lead, and PCBs) with the Project during the demolition phase of construction <br />or transport of these materials would not expose construction workers, the public, or the <br />environment to adverse conditions related to hazardous materials handling. <br /> <br />Findings Regarding Impact HAZ-2: The Revised Project would adhere to the all <br />regulatory requirements that apply to any identified hazardous building materials – specifically <br />lead-based paint, asbestos-containing materials (ACM), or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) <br />addressed in this impact – thereby reducing potential impacts that could result from the disturbance <br />of these materials during demolition. This impact is less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.7-13 to 4.7- <br />14; FEIR, p. 2-15.) <br />Impact HAZ-3: The Project could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment <br />through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of <br />hazardous materials into the environment. <br />Findings Regarding Impact HAZ-3: All activities associated with handling hazardous <br />materials during the Revised Project would be subject to the federal, state, and local laws in place <br />to ensure the proper handling of hazardous materials, in the event of an accidental release. As <br />analyzed in this impact in the DEIR, these include adherence to regulations and measures involving <br />storm water pollution prevention and post-construction operations plans and protocols. Adherence <br />to all applicable federal, state, and local laws would ensure that impacts from the Revised Project <br />would minimize the potential for upset and accidental release conditions. This impact is less than <br />significant. (DEIR, p. 4.7-14 to 4.7-15; FEIR, p. 2-15.) <br />Impact HAZ-5: Development of the Project would not be located within the airport land use <br />plan for the San Carlos Airport resulting in a safety hazard for people residing or working in <br />the project area. <br />Findings Regarding Impact HAZ-5: The Revised Project site is located outside of the <br />Airport Influence Area for the San Carlos Airport (Area B), and therefore is subject to the C/CAG <br />Board and ALUC for a determination of the land use policy consistency. This impact would be less <br />than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.7-15; FEIR, p. 2-15.) <br />4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality <br />Impact HYD-1: The Project would not violate water quality requirements or waste discharge <br />requirements. <br />Findings Regarding Impact HYD-1: The Revised Project would increase the percentage <br />of pervious site coverage to 40 percent, largely with the addition of substantial landscaping onsite. <br />Compliance with stormwater control measures and drainage control requirements would be <br />sufficient to address impacts related to water quality issues as a result of polluted runoff from future <br />ground disturbance. The impact would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.8-14; FEIR, p. 2-15.)