My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-08 0085 PC Reso Recommending CEQA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-08 0085 PC Reso Recommending CEQA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:34:07 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:33:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
11/1/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Harbor View Project PAGE 37 OF 48 ESA / 170951 <br />Final Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />ATTY/RESO.0085/PC RESO RECOMMENDING CEQA – EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 11-02-2022 VR <br />and/or eliminate one or more significant unavoidable impacts identified with the proposed Project <br />analyzed in the DEIR. <br />70/30 Office + Ancillary R&D Lab. This “70/30 Office + Ancillary R&D Lab” <br />Alternative represents total development of 1,179,748 square feet, comprised in four seven-story <br />buildings. This alternative contains 801,323 total square feet (70 percent) of regular Office use and <br />343,425 total square feet (30 percent) of ancillary R&D Lab use; this represents less R&D Lab area <br />than is allowed by the existing IR zoning designation. This alternative also involves a two-story <br />35,000 square-foot amenities building and two parking structures of three and five stories.11 This <br />alternative was included for consideration in response to public comments received during public <br />scoping of the EIR and the City’s decision to consider a mixed use office / R&D scenario reflective <br />of the mix being developed in the current local market: developments with a larger portion of <br />regular Office use than R&D lab use. <br />Alternative Site Location. This “Alternative Site Location” Alternative represents <br />development of the proposed Project at a location within Redwood City other than proposed Project <br />site, pursuant to Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines. The Project site is approximately 27.08 <br />acres adjacent to U.S. 101 and it’s on- /off-ramps. The area surrounding the Project site contains a <br />mix of light industrial, heavy industrial, public facilities, port-related and construction-related <br />commercial uses that are not expected to substantially transition, according to the General Plan. <br />Given the land area needed to accommodate the proposed development program, possible <br />alternative site locations within the City could exist along the Seaport Boulevard corridor or Seaport <br />Centre to the north of the Project site, as well as in Pacific Shores. The overall environmental setting <br />along the Seaport Boulevard corridor, Seaport Centre and Pacific Shores is not substantially <br />different from the Project site. <br />On-site Public Amenities. This “On-site Public Amenities” Alternative represents <br />development of three office buildings totaling approximately 882,000 square feet on the project <br />site in addition to up to four publically-accessible, adult soccer fields on one to four acres of the <br />Project site. This alternative also introduces ancillary child care within the amenities building to be <br />used by Project employees. <br />The basic access and configuration of development on the site would otherwise be the same <br />as with the proposed Project, and given the reduced development, this alternative includes two <br />three-story parking structures. The soccer fields would be synthetic turf underlain by composite <br />gravel but would not include spectator seating or other support facilities. The fields would include <br />minimal, as-needed pole lighting for nighttime use, in addition to the permanent nighttime and <br />security lighting that would be provided for the entire office campus. This alternative responds to <br />comments received during scoping of this EIR, however, neither the City nor the Project applicant <br />put forth a proposal for development of a sports field facility on the site. <br /> 11 27.08 acres equals 1,179,747 square feet of site area, and a 1.0 FAR is assumed, like the proposed Projects. <br />Excluding the amenities buildings, 70 percent totals approximately 801,323 square feet of regular Office use, and <br />30 percent totals approximately 343,425 square feet of R&D Lab use.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.