Reso PC22-08 0085 PC Reso Recommending CEQA

Browse Search

Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act Harbor View Project PAGE 43 OF 48 ESA / 170951 Final Environmental Impact Report October 2022 ATTY/RESO.0085/PC RESO RECOMMENDING CEQA – EXHIBIT A REV: 11-02-2022 VR Redwood City other than proposed Project site, pursuant to Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines. The offsite location would be within the Seaport Boulevard corridor or Seaport Centre to the north of the Project site, as well as in Pacific Shores given the lack of feasible sites elsewhere in the City. The “Alternative Site Location” Alternative is hereby rejected from further consideration because it would not reduce or avoid any of the significant effects of the Revised Project. Explanation. Under the “Alternative Site Location” Alternative, development of 765,150 square feet of commercial office use at a different location in or near Redwood City would likely result in similar impacts on other neighborhoods as those identified with the Harbor View Project. The Project site is approximately 27.08 acres adjacent to U.S. 101 and it’s on- /off-ramps. The area surrounding the Project site contains a mix of light industrial, heavy industrial, public facilities, port-related and construction-related commercial uses that are not expected to substantially transition, according to the General Plan. The overall environmental setting in the Seaport Boulevard corridor or Seaport Centre to the north of the Project site, or in Pacific Shores is not substantially different from the Project site conditions. The conservatively significant cumulative air quality impact identified for the Revised Project (Impact AIR-1.CU) (exceeding growth assumptions of the 2017 Clean Air Plan) is assumed to still occur with the “Alternative Site Location” Alternative since the Office land use program is the same for both scenarios. Development in the potential locations would still require the similar amendments to the General Plan Map and Zoning Map to adopt and apply a “Commercial Office Professional /Technology (CP)” land use designation and “Commercial Park (CP)” zoning district, respectively, to the alternative development location. Development of the Project in a nearby alternative location would have similar significant and unavoidable effects on the area intersection and roadway network, since the nearby alternative sites are near and would generate trips affecting Woodside Road (SR84), Highway 101, and the potential Blomquist extension. All transportation impacts, including the numerous significant determinations, would continue to occur with the “Alternative Site Location” Alternative. Site control of a viable alternative site is a key consideration. The Project Applicant is a private developer that controls the proposed Project site and does not own property in any of the aforementioned nearby areas or elsewhere in the City that could accommodate the proposed development, including with the primary recreation and open space element central to the site. As such, this alternative may equally meet each of the objectives of the Harbor View Project. Although the areas considered for the alternative site location are not as centrally located in the area generally delineated as the “Inner Harbor” in the Draft Inner Harbor Specific Plan (City of Redwood City, 2015), it is presumed that the selected property would still allow the internal site orientation and clustered development around recreation or open space amenities, bicycle/pedestrian connections onsite and to Downtown. Overall, because this alternative would not likely reduce or avoid significant impacts of the Revised Project,