My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-09 0083 PC Reso Recommending General Plan Amendment Approval Harbor View Project
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-09 0083 PC Reso Recommending General Plan Amendment Approval Harbor View Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:35:40 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:35:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
11/1/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ATTY/AGR/2022.389/HARBOR VIEW PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT <br />REV: 10-28-2022 VR 27 <br />development of the Property separately from or jointly with City, and this Agreement does not <br />limit the authority of such other public agencies. Nevertheless, City shall be bound by, and shall <br />abide by, its covenants and obligations under this Agreement in all respects when dealing with any <br />such agency regarding the Property. Cit y shall cooperate with Developer, at Developer’s expense, <br />to the extent appropriate and as permitted by Applicable Law, in Developer’s efforts to obtain, as <br />may be required, Other Agency Subsequent Approvals. Nothing in this Section 10.4 shall relieve <br />Developer of its obligation to comply with the Project Approvals, notwithstanding any conflict <br />between the Other Agency Subsequent Approvals and the Project Approvals. Notwithstanding the <br />issuance to Developer of Other Agency Subsequent Approvals, Developer agrees that City may <br />reasonably review and comment upon any materials or applications associated with Other Agency <br />Subsequent Approvals to ensure consistency with the Project Approvals and Developer shall make <br />diligent good faith efforts to incorporate any and all changes requested by City prior to submitting <br />such materials and applications for review and/or approval to the other governmental or quasi- <br />governmental entities with jurisdiction over the Project. <br />Section 10.5 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge. <br />A. The filing of any third party lawsuit(s) against City or Developer relating to <br />the Project Approvals or this Agreement or construction of the Project shall not delay or stop the <br />development, processing, or construction of the Project or approval of any Subsequent Approvals, <br />unless the third party obtains a court order preventing the activity. City shall not stipulate to or <br />cooperate in the issuance of any such order. <br />B. City and Developer shall cooperate in the defense of any court action or <br />proceeding instituted by a third party or other governmental entity or official challenging the <br />validity of any provision of the Project Approvals or this Agreement (“Litigation Challenge”), and <br />the Parties shall keep each other informed of all developments relating to such defense, subject <br />only to confidentiality requirements that may prevent the communication of such information. To <br />the extent Developer desires to contest or defend such Litigation Challenge, (a) Developer shall <br />take the lead role defending such Litigation Challenge and may, in its sole discretion, elect to be <br />represented by the legal counsel of its choice; (b) City may, in its sole discretion, elect to be <br />separately represented by the legal counsel of its choice, with the reasonable costs of such <br />representation to be paid by Developer; (c) Developer shall reimburse City, within thirty (30) days <br />following City’s written demand therefor, which may be made from time to time during the course <br />of such Litigation Challenge, all reasonable costs incurred by City in connection with the Litigation <br />Challenge, including City’s reasonable administrative, legal, and court costs and City Attorney <br />oversight expenses; and (d) Developer shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Cit y Parties <br />from and against any damages, attorneys’ fees, or cost awards, including attorneys’ fees awarded <br />under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against City by way of <br />judgment, settlement, or stipulation. Upon request by Developer, City shall enter into a joint <br />defense agreement in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney to facilitate the sharing of <br />materials and strategies related to the defense of such Litigation Challenge without waiver of <br />attorney client privilege. Any proposed settlement of a Litigation Challenge by a Party shall be <br />subject to the approval of the other Party, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, <br />conditioned, or delayed. If the terms of the proposed settlement would constitute an amendment <br />or modification of this Agreement or any Project Approvals, the settlement shall not become <br />effective unless such amendment or modification is approved by City in accordance with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.