My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-09 0083 PC Reso Recommending General Plan Amendment Approval Harbor View Project
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-09 0083 PC Reso Recommending General Plan Amendment Approval Harbor View Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:35:40 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:35:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
11/1/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTY/RESO.0083/PC RESO RECOMMENDING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVAL – HARBOR VIEW PROJECT <br />REV: 10-28-22 VR <br />Page 9 of 9 <br />iv. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will <br />not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, <br />property within the proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate public <br />easements will be provided. <br /> <br />The proposed subdivision and associated improvements will not <br />conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, <br />property within the proposed subdivision. Additionally, the project site does <br />not have any public utilities or associated improvements that would be in <br />conflict with the proposed project. <br /> <br />v. The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions <br />applied for comply with requirements for findings described in Section <br />30.69, and the tentative map is deemed not workable without the granting <br />of such exceptions. No exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance are <br />requested. <br /> <br />vi. Such other findings of conflict with written public policy or with <br />the public interest as the Planning Commission may determine. <br /> <br />The proposed project does not conflict with any written public policy <br />or with the public interest. <br /> <br />vii. In addition, the following finding is required by Government <br />Code Section 66473.5: The proposed subdivision, together with the <br />provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General <br />Plan. <br /> <br />The proposed Tentative Map and land use is compatible with the <br />objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the City’s <br />General Plan as described in this staff report. While the state law also <br />references specific plans, there is no specific plan that applies to the project <br />site. <br /> <br />b. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council <br />approve the Vesting Tentative Map subject to the Conditions of Approval attached <br />hereto as Exhibit D. <br /> <br />8. This resolution is effective upon its adoption. <br /> <br />* * * <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.