Reso PC22-13 0108 PC Reso Recommending Approval of DTPP 1330 ECR

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0108/PC RESO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DTPP 1330 ECR REV: 01-11-23 JB Page 5 of 23 A. The map, design, or improvement of the proposed subdivision are inconsistent with the general or specific plans, the Zoning Ordinance, or subdivision improvement requirements. The proposed combination is consistent with the City’s General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and subdivision improvement requirements. The newly combined parcel meets all minimum lot size, width, and square footage requirements and was evaluated by the City’s Engineering Division to ensure compliance with the subdivision improvement requirements. B. The site is not physically suited for the proposed type or density of development. The project site is located within the Mixed-Use Downtown character area of the General Plan and zoned for multi-family medium density residential use. The site already includes the necessary infrastructure to support such a use. The project is consistent with the DTPP. C. The design or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems. The project will not cause substantial environmental damage as the lots are already developed with existing structures and associated parking areas and located along the major corridor of El Camino Real. The proposed lot would accommodate future residences as permitted by the General Plan and DTPP and would not cause degradation of habitat or public health problems. D. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate public easements will be provided. The design or improvements of the proposed combination does not conflict with essential public easements. E. The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions applied for do not comply with requirements for findings described in Section 30.69, and the tentative map is deemed not workable without the granting of such exceptions. No exceptions are needed for the proposed combination. F. Such other findings of conflict with written public policy or with the public interest as the Subdivision Committee may determine.