My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agda Pkt 2024.08.26 Regular Meeting
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
Agda Pkt 2024.08.26 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2024 10:48:21 AM
Creation date
8/27/2024 10:41:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/26/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1018
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8 <br />2023-2024 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury <br />● We have been using the external auditors and have been reviewing the internal <br />controls with them annually. <br />● This is done with the regular annual audit. We do not have reasons to justify an <br />additional assessment. <br />● Annually, the internal controls are updated as part of our external audit, not <br />separately from the external audit process. <br /> <br />The reports from external auditors include limitations on the results of its review of internal <br />controls they conduct in connection with an audit. These limitations include statements like “we <br />did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses” <br />and “material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.” The external auditor reports <br />are clear that they do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of internal controls. <br />The Civil Grand Jury interviewed a Certified Public Accountant who audits local governments <br />and agencies and confirmed that management should assess its internal controls independently of <br />the external auditor’s work, noting management can separately refer to the independent auditor’s <br />work in its report to its governing board regarding internal controls. <br />Furthermore, the Certified Public Accountant and interviewees generally agreed that if <br />management performed its own assessment of its internal controls, the results of that assessment <br />can be shared with the external auditor and the auditor may use those results in designing audit <br />work, increasing efficiency. Increases in efficiency in external audits likely at least partially <br />offset any incremental staff work in conducting management’s assessment. <br />Survey Responses <br /> <br />Survey requests were sent to 75 entities, including municipalities, school districts, independent <br />special districts and joint power authorities. Responses were received from 54 entities. <br /> <br />Given the enormity of the challenge of reviewing individual controls at any one agency, the Civil <br />Grand Jury looked into the way government entities in San Mateo County assess its internal <br />controls and how the results of those assessments are reported to governing boards and to the <br />public. This assessment and reporting should follow the State of California guidelines and the <br />underlying referenced guidelines from the Green Book and the Committee of Sponsoring <br />Corporations. Management’s assessment of its internal controls and communication, both <br />internally within an entity and externally to the entity’s constituents, are key principles of <br />internal controls. <br />6.C. - Page 12 of 22 <br />91
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.