|
ATTY/RESO.0110/PC RESO STANFORD BLOCK C
<br />REV: 11-30-23 VR
<br />Page 2 of 5
<br />WHEREAS, on November 24, 2023, a public hearing notice was published in the
<br />San Mateo Daily Journal and mailed to interested parties and all property owners within
<br />300 feet of the Property; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, on December 5, 2023, the Planning Commission considered the staff
<br />reports, oral and written, and testimony and materials presented by all those wishing to
<br />be heard on this Project at the noticed public hearing on this matter; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, on December 5, 2023, the Planning Commission conducted a duly
<br />noticed public hearing, in accordance with all applicable requirements of the State
<br />Planning and Zoning Law, the Redwood City Code, and the Redwood City Zoning
<br />Ordinance, to consider approval of the Project, and received and considered oral and
<br />written reports and application materials; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the Commission considered a CEQA Consistency Checklist and its
<br />findings prepared by the City Planning Division’s consultant, David J. Powers and
<br />Associates, the previously certified Stanford in Redwood City Environmental Impact
<br />Report (the “EIR”) (State Clearinghouse #2008102023), including the Statement of
<br />Overriding Considerations in City Council Resolution No. 15294, as part of the City’s
<br />consideration of the Project; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the Commission determined that the proposed Project is consistent
<br />with the Precise Plan goals, development standards, and urban design guidelines and
<br />applicable provisions of the Redwood City Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance, and
<br />Subdivision Map Act.
<br />
<br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
<br />THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />Section 1. Evidentiary Basis: The Planning Commission independently heard,
<br />considered, and weighed all the evidence in the record, including without limitation the
<br />staff report and the application materials, the EIR, planned community permit, tentative
<br />parcel map, and all other documents, reports, studies, memoranda, maps, oral and
<br />written testimony, and materials in the City’s file for the applications and the Project, and
<br />all adopted City planning documents relating to the Project and the property including the
<br />City’s General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, the Precise Plan, and other
<br />applicable City laws and regulations, and all associated approved and certified
<br />environmental documents, which have together served as an adequate and appropriate
<br />evidentiary basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution.
<br />
<br />Section 2. CEQA Consistency Checklist: The Planning Commission finds that:
<br />
<br />a. The CEQA Consistency Checklist was prepared in accordance with
<br />all legal requirements; and
<br />
|