Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Focused General Plan Update 42 <br />Final Environmental Impact Report January 2023 <br />implement mitigation strategies as required by the CDFG. Mitigation Measure BIO-6 <br />requires compensation for impacts to special status species habitat through preservation, <br />enhancement, and/or restoration of habitat or assist in the recovery of the species, and <br />mitigation measures required by the USFWS and/or the CDFG incorporated in project <br />plans and conditions of approval. Mitigation Measure BIO-7 requires limiting ground <br />disturbance to outside the avian nesting season, or if during the avian nesting season then <br />establishing staging and storage areas and creating buffers to reduce disturbance, as <br />determined by a qualified biologist. Mitigation Measure BIO-8a requires a bat habitat <br />assessment of trees and structures to be removed to be conducted by a qualified biologist; <br />if suitable roosting habitat or signs of bats are found, then Mitigation Measure 10 shall be <br />implemented. Mitigation Measure BIO-8b requires a dusk emergence bat survey for <br />roosting bats within 14 days prior to the removal of the tree(s) or structure(s), using acoustic <br />equipment to identify the species; if no roosting bats are found during the survey, then no <br />further action is required, but if roosting bats are found during the survey, a disturbance- <br />free buffer zone shall be established as directed by a qualified biologist. Mitigation <br />Measure BIO-9 requires a Fuel Reduction Management Plan be prepared by a wildland <br />resources expert in coordination with a biologist/ecologist for wildland fire protection <br />activities to ensure that sensitive resources are not impacted by wildland fire protection <br />activities. Mitigation Measure BIO-10 requires project proponents to obtain all necessary <br />permits pertaining to affected riparian habitat or Waters of the United States, including <br />wetlands, stream channel, and open-water habitat regulated by the USACOE, CDFG, and <br />San Francisco Bay RWQCB; discharge of fill requiring a CWA Section 404 permit from <br />the USACOE; CWA Section 401 certification from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB; and <br />any additional compensation for impacts to riparian habitat and wetlands as determined by <br />the permitting agency. Mitigation Measure BIO-11 requires implementing Best <br />Management Practices to avoid and/or control invasive weeds, particularly during wildland <br />fire protection projects and sea-level rise protection projects. Mitigation Measure BIO-12 <br />requires implementing Best Management Practices to prevent pollutant spills, and erosion <br />and sedimentation near sensitive habitats, including erosion control and spill prevention <br />measures implemented prior to the start project-related activities near riparian areas and <br />associated aquatic habitat and remaining in place throughout the construction duration. <br />Mitigation Measure BIO-13 requires uniformly applied standards for housing development <br />projects to reduce risk of avian collision, including design standards that reduce the amount <br />of glass facades on new buildings; apply glass and façade treatments in front of glass; <br />avoid, minimize, and treat glass railings and walkways near potential flight corridors; avoid <br />uplighting, light spillage, and use of green and blue lights; and use of motion sensing lights. <br />6.2.17 Transportation: <br />Mitigation Measures. EIR Mitigation Measures TR-1 and TR-2 (Draft EIR p. 4.17-41) <br />will be implemented for the Project as provided in the MMRP. <br />Findings Regarding Cumulative Transportation Impact: Based on the FEIR and the <br />entire record before the City, the Council finds that incorporating the requirements of <br />Mitigation Measures TR-1 and TR-2 would substantially lessen the severity of the