My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso24 16254
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
Reso24 16254
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2024 2:33:22 PM
Creation date
10/29/2024 2:29:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
10/28/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Focused General Plan Update program EIR was a “program” EIR in that it studied a <br />plan for the future housing development within the City, rather than, for example, a specific <br />development on a particular parcel for which a developer sought land use entitlements. <br />(See Focused General Plan Update program EIR, pp. 1-3, 1-4, and 3-22; see also CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15168[a] [“A program EIR is an EIR which may be prepared on a series <br />of actions that can be characterized as one large project”].) However, rather than provide <br />general analysis regarding a broad policy document, the Focused General Plan Update <br />program EIR provided in-depth analysis regarding potentially significant impacts, <br />mitigation measures, and alternatives related to the City’s plans for future housing <br />development within the City. <br /> <br />This Consistency Checklist is to determine whether further environmental review beyond <br />that which was provided by the Focused General Plan Update program EIR (from here on <br />referred to as the “Focused GPU EIR”) is necessary. <br />As noted above, CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 provides a statutory exemption from <br />additional CEQA analysis for projects that are consistent with the development density <br />established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR <br />was certified, except as may be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific <br />significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The following consistency <br />evaluation analyzes whether the 847 Woodside component is consistent with the <br />development density and use characteristics established by the General Plan and Zoning. <br />It also analyzes whether the 847 Woodside component is consistent with the analysis <br />performed for the Focused GPU EIR and if that document adequately anticipated and <br />described the impacts of the 847 Woodside component and identified applicable mitigation <br />measures necessary to reduce project specific impacts. <br />The General Plan Update EIR evaluated the Housing Element, including Program H1-6: <br />Densities in Mixed Use Zoning Districts which increased Mixed-Use Neighborhood <br />density from 40 du/ac to 60 du/ac and increased Mixed-Use Neighborhood heights from <br />40 feet for residential to 60 feet, and Program H4-4: Density Bonuses which called for <br />ensuring the City’s density bonus ordinance is consistent with Government Code §65915. <br />The maximum allowable residential density in the Mixed-Use Neighborhood District is 60 <br />dwelling units per acre (Zoning Ordinance Article 54.7). Given the size of the 847 <br />Woodside project site, the maximum allowable residential units/base density is 58 units. <br />However, given that 847 Woodside project is an affordable housing project, it is entitled <br />to a State density bonus in accordance with Government Code Section 65915 resulting in <br />a proposal of 86 residential units. As such, the project component is consistent with density <br />provided in the Housing Element of the General Plan for which the Focused GPU EIR was <br />certified. <br />The Redwood City Zoning Code includes density bonus regulations (Zoning Code Section <br />32.19) so a project that receives a density bonus and otherwise complies with the applicable <br />zoning requirements is consistent with the development density established by existing <br />zoning. This is supported by State density bonus law which states that the granting of a <br />density bonus “shall not require, or be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general plan <br />amendment, local coastal plan amendment, zoning change, or other discretionary <br />approval.” (Gov. Code Sec 65915(f)(5).) Similarly, a project that provides affordable <br />housing and receives a density bonus is consistent with the goals of the City’s Housing <br />Element, a component of the Redwood City General Plan, which acknowledges that the <br />city will implement the density bonus program (Housing Element, Program H4-4) to <br />encourage affordable housing in the city. <br />Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15168 (Program EIRs), 15162 (Subsequent EIR), <br />and 15163 (Supplemental EIR), if this analysis for the 847 Woodside component <br />ATTY/RESO.0070/CC RESO 1900 BROADWAY (CEQA) - EXHIBIT 1 - CEQA CONSISTENCY CHECK LIST <br />REV: 10-23-24 VR <br /> <br />Page 13 of 135
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.