Reso24 16254 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

covering architecturally distinctive/historic buildings or historic points of interest. The impact of the 847 Woodside project component, including but not limited to impacts on trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway, would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required because it is consistent with the existing land uses surrounding the project site, is within the maximum allowable height (a small portion of the stair penthouse would not be noticeable in light of screening provided by redwood trees that will remain), and would not substantially obstruct, interrupt, or detract from an existing scenic resource. For these reasons, the 847 Woodside project component would be consistent with the analysis in the Focused GPU EIR and would not create new impacts, increase impacts, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. c. As discussed in the Focused GPU program EIR (p. 4.1-10), the project component site is located in an urbanized area, and based on the infill nature of the development and adopted architectural standards, visual change from new development would be limited and the characteristics of surrounding neighborhoods would be substantially preserved. For this reason, the Focused GPU EIR concluded the impacts of new development would be less than significant. The proposed project component would be required to comply with adopted General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs intended to preserve scenic beauty and maintain community aesthetics, as discussed in Impact AES-1 and Impact AES-3 of the Focused GPU program EIR; the Regulatory Framework section of the Focused GPU EIR (“4.1.2 Regulatory Framework”); and other policies and programs identified in the Redwood City General Plan, especially those related to Goal BE-13 “Enhance the Woodside Road Corridor.” In particular, Policy BE‐13.4 provides: “Support new higher‐density residential development on Woodside Road, while ensuring that new development is sensitive to adjacent single‐unit residential neighborhoods.” All of these adopted policies and programs help protect views along major corridors, such as Woodside Road. The proposed project component would be consistent with General Plan Policy BE-13.4 as it would result in higher-density residential development on Woodside Road. The Mixed-Use Neighborhood (MUN) Zoning District is intended to provide opportunities for moderate-scale developments that facilitate pedestrian-friendly environments with the goal of providing areas for a variety of activities such as commercial, office, and moderate-density residential uses, or a mix thereof. The 847 Woodside project component is consistent with the vast majority of the over-50 development regulations, including building height, setbacks, site design, and landscaping requirements. The development standards that the 847 Woodside project requested modifications to result from an applicant request to apply the State Density Bonus law in order to provide the proposed 86 units of 100 percent affordable housing at the site, as also described in the project description (item #8 above). The two waivers to development standards that relate to architectural design include the waiver of daylight planes standards and the building length standards. In regards to daylight plane, the upper stories of the building would protrude past the daylight plane and in regards to the building length standards, the proposed building would exceed the maximum building length by approximately 20 feet. However, because the applicant is entitled under state law to certain deviations that are needed to accommodate affordable housing, they do not conflict with applicable scenic quality regulations. As discussed in the project description (item #8 above), proposed project component exterior materials would include concrete, metal panel, brick veneer, cement plaster, and tile, plus metal accents (light bronze) and metal railings and trim, primarily of earthtones with dark gray, dark brown, beige, and some dark blue. In addition, a mural is proposed along the northern street front portion of the project component (Plan Sheets PA3.1, PA3.2, and PA5.3, 10/27/23).The building footprint has corners and recesses, which provide variety in its external appearance. The site design provides outdoor open space, a recessed front entry, and semi-outdoor walkways, and integrates existing trees in the site design. These characteristics assist in defining the space with a semi-open, pedestrian-oriented feel and integrating with an important urban corridor. The inclusion of a 15-foot-deep rear yard that retains the 9 existing mature Coast Redwoods at the rear of the property enhances the visual quality of the building while also providing a buffer to the adjacent lower-density neighborhood. The proposed project component was reviewed at the April 25, 2024, Special Meeting of the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) to review the building, site, and urban design and to forward a recommendation to the Planning Commission. Staff recommended that the AAC forward a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approving the project. The AAC did not support the waiver for the intrusion into the daylight plane and recommended variety in the long flat elevations in light of the building length waiver and did not recommend approval of the design. [Note the project has since been revised to reduce the need for these deviations as is described in the attached memo.] As discussed in subsection (a) above, there are large redwood trees currently on the site that vary in height between approximately 30 and 75 feet tall adjacent to the residential uses to the east. These trees will be preserved in the redevelopment project and exceed the height of the proposed development and therefore the project’s intrusion into the daylight plane would not have a substantial impact on the existing scenic quality from the single-family ATTY/RESO.0070/CC RESO 1900 BROADWAY (CEQA) - EXHIBIT 1 - CEQA CONSISTENCY CHECK LIST REV: 10-23-24 VR Page 25 of 135